My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0614_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0614_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:11:39 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:41:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.4 Section ll. ���� E states: Three Parcel Minor Subdivision: When a subdivision creates a <br />total of three (3) or less parcels, situated in an area where public utilities and street rights <br />of way to serve the proposed parcels already exist in accordance with City codes, and no <br />further utility or street extensions are necessary, and the new parcels meet or exceed the <br />size requirements of the zoning code, the applicant may apply for a minor subdivision <br />approval. In this case neither parcel meets all requirements of the Cit.� A series of <br />VARIANCES are necessary before a decision on the Minor Subdivision can be made. <br />5.5 Section 1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements) establishes the minimum lot <br />standards for residential parcels, which includes: an 85 foot minimum width along a <br />public right-of-way; a 110 foot minimum depth; and 11,000 minimum square feet. <br />5.6 In Section 1013 the Code states ..... Where there are practical difficulties or unusual <br />hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this code, <br />the Variance Board shall have the power, in a specific case and after notice and <br />public hearings, to vary any such provision in harmony with the general purpose <br />and intent thereof and may impose such additional conditions as it considers <br />necessary so that the public health, safety, and general welfare may be secured and <br />substantial justice done. <br />5-� State Statute 462357, subd. 6(2) provides authority for the city to "hear requests <br />for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their <br />strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to <br />the individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when <br />it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of <br />the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a <br />variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used <br />under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due <br />to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the <br />variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic <br />considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the <br />property exists under the terms of the ordinance....The board or governing body as <br />the case may be may impose conditions in the granting of variances to insure <br />compliance and to protect" <br />5.8 The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls: The City Code prescribe that all single family residential <br />parcels be a minimum of 110 feet in depth and 11,000 sq. ft, in size. Mr. Trudeau has an <br />existing lot that is 193 feet deep on the north and 200 feet deep on the south. Mr. <br />Trudeau proposes to create two similarly sized and shaped parcels, although each is <br />unable to meet the depth and lot requirements. The lots across Pascal Street are 80 feet <br />wide by 131 and 10,480 sq. ft. in size and the lots across Simpson Street are creative <br />shapes averaging over 100 feet of width, 150 feet of depth and over 12,000 sq. ft. in size. <br />However, there are six parcels in the general vicinity that are of similar design and with <br />PF3571 RCA 061404 Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.