2004_0712_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council Study Session — 06/21/04 DRAFT Minutes - Page 10 direction prior to September 30, 2004 deadline. Mr. Noonan concluded his comments by seeking a partnership for a workable plan that would serve the best interests of the City of Roseville. 6.b Schedule for Addressing Land Use Issues, Financial Schedule for "Gap Strategies," and other Essential Subjects Addressing Land Mr. Welsch reviewed the proposed schedule, as outlined in the staff report dated June 21, 2004 that would address the incremental steps to broaden the base of existing financial gaps; public policies to discuss and resolve; ultimate consistency with the AUAR of 2001, the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Developer's Master Plan. Mr. Welsch recommended that time be reserved at the July 12, 2004 meeting to publicly thank and acknowledge the participants of the Stakeholder's Panel for their time and commitment to this process. Mr. Welsch further noted that the City would be utilizing the services of the City's Development Attorney, Jim Casserly, to provide further analysis in August and September of the financial implications; with the sketch plan and informal review scheduled for the August 4, 2004 Planning Commission meeting; and formal application in September for formal Council reaction. Mr. Welsch anticipated that one to two hours of dialogue at each scheduled Council meeting would be needed. City Manager Beets noted that the proposed dates were a11 regularly scheduled Council meetings, with no special meetings scheduled; however, he noted that staff sought Council direction and permission to occupy a substantial amount of each of those agendas for this discussion. Councilmember Kough noted that these discussions would coincide with the 2005 Budget discussions; with City Manager Beets concurring. Councilmember Ihlan expressed concern that the City Council's business calendar was already substantial during Use Issues, Financial "Gap Strategies," and other Essential Subjects