My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0712_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0712_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 2:12:47 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:43:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — 06/21/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 12 <br />Stakeholder's Panel process, the Master Developer <br />(Rottlund Homes) was charged to return to the City <br />Council with an identification of land to be acquired <br />to implement the plan and to provide financial <br />feasibility; <br />2) End of December: The Developer was charged with <br />refining their financial assistance plan; and to work <br />up a final concept plan for the sanction or approval <br />of the City Council; and <br />3) End of March of 2005: Provide a definitive plan for <br />which the City Council could consider casting <br />approval; then to prepare Preliminary Plats for <br />specific areas. <br />Mr. Noonan noted that this schedule had been at the <br />suggestion of Councilmember Ihlan to phase the process <br />into a more manageable scenario. <br />Councilmember Ihlan concurred with Mr. Noonan's <br />timeline, based on previous discussions and her <br />recollections. Councilmember Ihlan noted that, on July 19, <br />2004, the Council's consideration of the financial <br />feasibility of the project was a priority, and expressed her <br />preference for as much information to be brought forward <br />as possible as to the specific kind of support from the <br />developer plan; the developer's proposed acquisition plan <br />and whether the Council would be asked to consider <br />eminent domain; anticipated financial implications and <br />suggested financial gap strategies. Councilmember Ihlan <br />opined that the more information the City Council had <br />available to them at their July 19 meeting, the more <br />productive the meeting would be both from the City's <br />and/or developer's standpoint. <br />Mr. Noonan concurred with Councilmember Ihlan's <br />observations, but noted that the challenge was not to <br />overwhelm participants; how to manage the process; and in <br />general, the developer's preference for a process similar to <br />that used for the Stakeholder's Panel, then more details and <br />specifics provided at a later date. Mr. Noonan noted that, it <br />was his intent on July 19, to provide a completed refined <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.