My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0712_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0712_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 2:12:47 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:43:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Manager's 2005 Budget Memo <br />Page 23 of 27 <br />maintenance tasks year-round. A third skidsteer would make it less <br />likely we would have maintenance personnel available to work but <br />with no appropriate vehicle at hand to do the job. <br />Council Action Recommendation #79: Council motion approving <br />[disapproving] adding a third skidsteer (��Bobcat") to the city's <br />fleet of maintenance vehicles. <br />Another skidsteer combined with pooling maintenance employees <br />for snowplowing in the wintertime is the basis for my next recom- <br />mendation: That we reduce through attrition two field maintenance <br />employees within the Public Works and Parks and Recreation areas. <br />The efficiency and productivity we gain from consolidating employ- <br />ees for wintertime snowplowing and adding a third skidsteer ap- <br />proximates the lost productivity of two retiring or departing employ- <br />ees. I can't and won't guarantee that maintenance service levels <br />would be entirely unaffected. Depending on who retires or leaves <br />city employment, there could be an impact. Sut I know we need to <br />save money and I know we can't do that by continuing to carry the <br />same number of employees. And I also know that any reduction in <br />service levels should be manageable — given the other steps men- <br />tioned above. <br />Council Action Recommendation #20: Council motion approving <br />[disapproving] the elimination through attrition of two full-time <br />employees in Public Works and Parks and Recreation Mainte- <br />nance. <br />I also make two significant revenue recommendations that generally <br />fall in the Public Works area. One is to institute a Street Light Utility. <br />We spend over $170,000 in tax revenue each year providing street <br />lights throughout the city. In "light" of the loss of $700,000 in general <br />purpose state aid, I think the time is now to create this utility and <br />collect revenues sufficient to pay the $170,000 in costs currently borne <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.