My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0719_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0719_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 3:51:16 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:43:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ROSEVILLE CITY COUNCIL <br />EVALUATION OF CITY MANAGER <br />Explanations and Directions Performance Evaluation as Team Building <br />�������������������fffff�#####■� <br />Evaluation as Team Building <br />If evaluation is to be, in the truest sense a means of team building, certain conditions <br />must prevail. The two processes must be compatible and interrelated in the following <br />ways: <br />1. Evaluation is basically a means, not an end in itself. <br />2. The trust level between the evaluatee and evaluators must be high. <br />3. The roles each are to fulfill must be clearly indicated and accepted. <br />4. Responsibilities are matched with pre-determined standards of <br />performance. <br />Definition of Roles <br />A. City Council <br />1. Conduct annual assessments of performance of the City <br />Manager. <br />2. Respect the prerogatives of the City Manager insofar as <br />operational management function of the organization is concerned <br />and the policy function of the Council. <br />3. Make assessments in �eneral terms except in instances where <br />specific improvements are needed or when explicit commendations <br />are due. <br />B. City Manager <br />1. Accepts the prospects of annual evaluations. <br />2. Understands the scope and thrust of the evaluations. <br />3. Expects the evaluations to adhere to the established procedures for <br />evaluating the performance of the City Manager. <br />Pre-DeterminedPerformance Standards <br />A performance standard is defined as the condition that will exist when a responsibility or <br />function is successfully performed. It is essential that a performance standard be <br />established, at the outset, for each of the eight major areas of responsibility of the City <br />Manager. This is necessary in order to use the rating scale effectively. <br />Major Areas of Responsibility <br />It should be reiterated that in determining the appropriate level of expectations, actual <br />performance must be measured in relation to the indicated standard of performance. <br />Seven major areas of responsibility are identified as the basis upon which assessments are <br />to be made. Descriptors are provided under each to clarify the meaning and content of <br />the area. However, the evaluation is made of the major area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.