Laserfiche WebLink
Infrastructure Replacement funds are specifically designated for the replacement of existin� <br />roadwavs and are committed to previously identified proj ects for the next 5-7 years. <br />The City could look for alternatives such as seeking federaUstate/county monies, creating a <br />transportation utility, etc., but the reliability of these monies are uncertain at this time. As a <br />further alternative, the City could change the alignment and/or design to create small or no <br />streets within portions of Twin Lakes. However, this would likely create other impacts. <br />Policy #7: Assessments for New Development <br />The use of special assessments to fund infrastructure costs, remain a consideration within the <br />Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area. The City's current assessment policy calls for the <br />development to pay for 100% of the applicable infrastructure costs, including road, utilities, <br />ponding, etc. Consideration should be given whether the added infrastructure, including Twin <br />Lakes Parkway, should be included in that calculation in part or in whole. This will necessitate a <br />discussion on whether the infrastructure serves a need outside of the project area, and depending <br />on the outcome, would certainly have a fmancial impact on the overall costs that are attributable <br />to the proj ect. <br />Final Comments <br />The policy issues identified above should be considered in the context of what potential benefits <br />are derived if the Twin Lakes area is redeveloped. Successful cities make considerable effort to <br />assess the risk/reward relationship that exists with redevelopment projects, and the potential <br />economic development and fmancing tools that are available. <br />