Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />�- <br />Public Works Department/Engineering <br />emo <br />To: Duane Schwartz, Public Works Director; <br />From: Debra Bloom, Assistant Public Works Director <br />Date: 8/1112004 <br />Re: Street Light Assessment & Electric Franchise Fee <br />In his 2005 Budget memo, City Manager Neal Beets proposed two Council Action items <br />regarding Street Light Assessment and an Electric Franchise Fee. We wanted to take this <br />opportunity to address the feasibility of both of these proposed fees. <br />Street Light Assessment: <br />The proposed 2005 City Streetlight budget is $176,300. This budget covers the annual energy <br />and maintenance costs of the 1150 streetlights that exist throughout the City. It also pays for <br />the energy for stoplights and EVPs at City street intersections. The funding of this budget <br />relies solely on the general tax levy. This budget increases every time a new streetlight is <br />added. Also, our maintenance costs vary from year to year. Maintenance costs for Xcel- <br />owned streetlights are built into the monthly charge. However, maintenance on city-owned <br />facilities is provided by the City of St. Paul on Larpenteur Avenue and by private contractors <br />on other city streetlights. <br />As described in the budget memo, the streetlight budget could be funded through an <br />assessment added to the city's quarterly water and sewer bill. The City would control the <br />billing and allocation of these funds, it would add an additional line on the bill, and would not <br />require a separate mailing. In the interest of determining the potential cost to individual <br />property owners for a streetlight assessment we have attached prepared a proposal with a <br />sample rate structure. These rates are based on what other Cities used when they implemented <br />a similar assessment. Also, two different budget totals have been analyzed, the first would <br />provide enough revenue to cover the proposed 2005 budget of $176,300. The second would <br />allow for an increase in funding to allow for "system improvements" as discussed in Mr. <br />Beets' memo. For the purpose of discussion we set this alternate budget at $250,000 which <br />would allow for the construction or replacement of an additional 20 streetlights and their <br />associatedmaintenance fees. <br />� Page 1 <br />