My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0823_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0823_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 11:15:31 AM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:44:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting — 08/09/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 19 <br />Revenue Bonds; <br />• Consideration will be given to the use of Special <br />Assessments; <br />• Consideration will be given to reducing the <br />contingency fund with a maximum reduction not to <br />exceed one percent (1%); <br />• Consideration will be given to a minimal reduction <br />in City administrative fees, but only after a detailed <br />review of city-incurred costs as a result of the <br />proj ect; <br />• Consideration will be given to approaching the State <br />of Minnesota regarding funding for off-site <br />improvements to the County Road C exit off of I- <br />35W; <br />• Consideration will be given to the use of a hazardous <br />substance sub-district, supported by Revenue Bonds <br />as a sole source of funding; <br />• Consideration will not be given to the use of any <br />City funds as loans to the project (identified as Gap <br />Strategy #11); and <br />• Consideration will be given to the availability and <br />use of Environmental Remediation grants. <br />Mr. Casserly clarified that the motion maker's intent was <br />that the City would not hold a Revenue Note, but that they <br />were not opposed to someone else in the market place <br />holding that note. <br />Councilmember Maschka concurred with Mr. Casserly's <br />interpretation. <br />Councilmember Ihlan reiterated her opposition to <br />committing additional costs for consulting fees without <br />public comment. Councilmember Ihlan adamantly urged <br />the City Council to schedule a public hearing immediately <br />prior to consideration of any additional financial aspects of <br />this project. <br />Councilmember Kough concurred with Councilmember <br />Ihlan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.