My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0927_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0927_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 9:51:44 AM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:45:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
367
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — 09/20/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 11 <br />D. Roseville Resident (Immigrant) <br />The resident expressed confusion regarding the spreadsheet <br />displayed during the meeting and assumptions provided in <br />Mr. Casserly's report. He further questioned how much it <br />would cost the City during the first five (5) years, and when <br />would the value of the property increase sufficiently to <br />allow the city to realize revenue from the project. He then <br />asked for a"best" and "worst" case scenario. <br />Mr. Casserly reiterated the City's structuring that dictated <br />that the developer advance the costs, and noted that if the <br />investment producing sufficient revenues, the developer <br />would not get paid. Mr. Casserly noted that if the revenues <br />exceeded projections, the TIF' District could be retired prior <br />to the 25 year limit. Mr. Casserly concurred with previous <br />comments that the projections were assumptions, but <br />expressed confidence in the sources and experience used <br />for making the assumptions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.