My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0927_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0927_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 9:51:44 AM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:45:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
367
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Special Study Session — 09/09/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 5 <br />availability of the stage. <br />City Manager Neal Beets clarified and expanded on his Memo <br />recommendation, Item #2, regarding inflationary costs and <br />projected levies; the City's purchase and provision of goods and <br />services from a taxpayer perspective. <br />Councilmember Schroeder opined that his philosophy was that <br />an annual evaluation of goods and services needed to be <br />performed, not just to automatically and annually increase the <br />levy. <br />Councilmember Maschka concurred with Councilmember <br />Schroeder regarding use of inflationary projections as a <br />benchmark when considering projected levies. <br />Mayor Klausing clarified that, had the expenses not been reduced <br />in the 2004 Budget, the City would be even further behind in the <br />structural Budget situation, based on inflation. <br />Finance Director Miller concurred. <br />Councilmember Ihlan clarified that the impacts of a combined <br />zero-percent levy for the last three years, in addition to state and <br />cumulative inflationary increases, left few alternatives other than <br />increasing the levy. Councilmember Ihlan sought Council <br />consensus on the maximum levy to be considered for submission <br />to Ramsey County by September 15, 2004; recognizing that the <br />proposed levy could then be reduced before final adoption and <br />upon further refinement by the City Council over the next few <br />months. <br />Councilmember Ihlan concurred with a majority of <br />Councilmember Maschka's recommendations, and proposed a <br />10% levy increase, but questioned whether that percentage was <br />adequate without further reductions in personnel or programs. <br />Councilmember Maschka opined that his interpretation of recent <br />public comment was that it was a quality of life issue; and <br />encouraged staff to seek adequate press coverage to allow people <br />to be informed and to provide input to the City Council on the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.