My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_1011_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_1011_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 3:11:04 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:45:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting — 02/23/04 <br />Page 21 <br />11. Consider Process for Appointing and Reappointing Members <br />of Roseville Citizen Advisory Commissions <br />City Manager Beets advised that there were nine (9) commission <br />terms expiring on March 31, 2004 on five (5) standing <br />commissions; and sought guidance and direction from <br />Councilmembers on how they wished staff to proceed with the <br />vacancies. Mr. Beets noted that the appointment process had <br />previously been brought forward at the January 5, 2004 <br />organizational meeting; and questions had been raised at that <br />time and directed to City Attorney Anderson as to the process <br />following Resolution No. 9372. Mr. Beets referred to the City <br />Attorney opinion dated February 6,2004 and attached to the staff <br />report dated February 23,2004. <br />Discussion included whether to follow the resolution, amend it or <br />rescind it; whether sitting commissioners needed to reapply if <br />they had not reached their maximum term limit; and criteria used <br />for reappointment. <br />Councilmember Maschka spoke in support of the resolution, <br />opining it was good policy. <br />City Manager Beets reviewed those commissions that did not <br />have a fiill complement to fill vacancies (Human Rights, 1 <br />vacancy; Parks and Recreation, 4 vacancies, with two of those <br />eligible not seeking reappointment, netting 2 vacancies). <br />Councilmember Kough recognized those serving, but opined his <br />support of seeking other qualified applicants from the <br />community for evaluation, interview and appointment. <br />Mayor Klausing confirmed that he continued to support the <br />interview process prior to appointment, but didn't support <br />declaring a vacancy when a commissioner was eligible for <br />reappointment, unless a problem was evident. Mayor Klausing <br />referenced the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) <br />and the need to consider those statutory appointments in <br />September under separate action. Mayor Klausing supported <br />following the resolution, and interview for vacancies. <br />Attachment 2 <br />(10/11/04) <br />Consider Process <br />for Appointing and <br />Reappointing <br />Members of <br />Roseville Citizea <br />Advisory <br />Commissions <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.