2004_1011_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council Regular Meeting — 09/27/04 DRAFT Minutes - Page 26 concluded by speaking in support of continuing to pursue these opportunities through the next stage. Councilmember Ihlan responded to fellow Council comments, opining that by withdrawing from the exclusive negotiations agreement, it would not "pull the plug" on the project and they could continue through the Planning Commission phase, but that it would define the City's role and slow the process to provide further consideration. Councilmember Ihlan continued to reiterate her previous positions. Councilmember requested a point of clarification from the Chair; questioning the need for further comment. The Chair allowed additional comments to continue. Councilmember Ihlan continued her rebuttal of Council comments in opposition to her alternate resolution proposal and motion. Joe Machyowsky, 2690 N Oxford Street Mr. Machyowsky spoke in support and noted that he completely agreed with the enlightened positions of Councilmembers Ihlan and Kough. Mr. Machyowsky opined that the community had become persuaded that the proposed Twin Lakes Redevelopment project was not a good thing for the community; and encouraged the City Council to reconfirm their commitment and dedication to the welfare of those who elected the Council, by voting "no" to this financial proposal at this time, showing that they consider the welfare of the community ahead of any special interest groups. Mr. Machyowsky further opined that such Council action would be rewarded with an outpouring of appreciation and goodwill throughout the community. Karen Milton, 2939 Mildred Drive (E Side of Langton Lake) Ms. Milton expressed her opposition to the project and her concerns regarding detriments to Langton Lake and its natural state; increased traffic; her lack of support for subsidizing private development; and alleged campaign contributions to at least four