My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_1011_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_1011_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 3:11:04 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:45:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />�a <br />B <br />� <br />from single-family dwellings or else from other senior housing. Seniors tend to have <br />lived in their units between 2 and 4 years. <br />Of those seniors who moved out of Roseville multifamily housing units in the past few <br />years, about half of them stayed in Roseville and half moved to other parts of the 11- <br />county metro. There was little indication that seniors were relocating to other Corridor <br />cities. As may be expected, older residents moving out of senior housing in Roseville <br />chose other senior-designated dwellings for their next residences. <br />1 Il Building Characteristics: <br />I� The majority of the senior apartments are 1-bedroom residences, and nearly a third of the <br />L� senior units have 2-bedrooms. The average value of senior buildings per unit is in the mid <br />L� $SO,OOOs, higher than the average value of general occupancy apartments. This is <br />M� probably true because most of the senior housing is Roseville has been built in the last 10 <br />l5 years and they generally include more amenities than the older general occupancy <br />l b apartments. <br />I� <br />�S <br />�� <br />�4 <br />�� <br />�� <br />�3 <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�7 <br />�B <br />�� <br />�� <br />aL <br />3? <br />i� <br />3� <br />35 <br />3fi <br />37 <br />�M <br />34 <br />�� <br />�I <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />��, <br />47 <br />�R <br />Income and Diversity: <br />The average income of the senior renters is determined to be just under $24,000, which is <br />comparable to many of the non-senior apartment complexes. Seniors' income is hard to <br />calculate as they are not receiving new sources of income. The majority of reported <br />senior income comes from Social Security; however, their housing costs could be paid <br />from other sources of funds. <br />The senior rentals are over 96 percent white. Of the nonwhite senior renters, there is <br />greatest representation of Asian-American residents. <br />2.b. Condos, Duplexes, Townhomes and Mobile Homes that are Rental: <br />Condominiums and townhomes are generally available as ownership units rather than <br />rentals, but Roseville does have one rental condo complex, two rental townhome <br />complexes, one set of duplexes, as well as one mobile home park. These types of homes <br />total just under 400 housing units, or about 8.5 percent of the all of the rental housing <br />units in Roseville. <br />Population: <br />Of these types of units, townhomes have the highest number of persons per household at <br />just over 2 persons per household. Condos have the highest percentage of senior residents <br />(13.6%); townhomes have the highestpercentage of children living in the units (9.1%). <br />Mobile home householders tend to be older than their counterparts in the rental condos, <br />townhomes and duplexes. <br />TenurelMoving Trends: <br />Condo and mobile home residents generally have lived at their current address longer <br />than those living in townhomes or duplexes. When residents of these types of units move, <br />they are most likely to stay in Roseville if they are moving out of condos. <br />Income and Diversity: <br />MULTIFANIILY HOUSING REPORT FOR ROSEVILLE - DRAFT 8/16/04 P;��� 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.