Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville City Council <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />are mounted within the vessel, removing the tubes for cleaning and pressure <br />testing is not an option.) The vessel was inspected. Chiller tubes were pres- <br />sure tested. Thirteen leaks in chiller tubes were eventually identified; those <br />tubes were plugged off. (Giventhe number of steel tubes in the chiller vessel, <br />the system can successfully operate even if some tubes are plugged.) Then, <br />last week the vessel was reassembled, recharged with brine and ammonia, and <br />repressurized. <br />However, the chiller vessel is still not holding pressure. We have asked Gartner <br />to return and disassemble one end of the chiller vessel so we can see what is <br />going on inside. This will cost approximately $9,000 to erect the scaffolding <br />and hoists and winches necessary to access and remove the end of the vessel <br />assembly, and to purge the vessel of brine and ammonia so we can inspect it. <br />As this report is being written we don't know � previously plugged tubes are <br />leaking, if entirely new leaks have developed in additional tubes, or some com- <br />bination of the two. But, to say the least, it is disturbing that the chiller vessel <br />is still not holding pressure. <br />C. Staff s Concern. <br />Our concern is this: Maybe the steel cooling tubes have reached the end of <br />their useful life. At a cost of $80,000 we have plugged 13 tubes; yet, upon re- <br />charging with brine and ammonia and upon system start-up even more leaks <br />have now developed in the chiller vessel. At this cost, how long can we go on <br />re-opening the chiller vessel and plugging leaky tubes? Perhaps the existing <br />800+ steel tubes have been weakened by the effects of corrosion to the point <br />that those tubes have become brittle and fragile. If so, they will routinely de- <br />velop more and more leaks. <br />II. Options <br />Staff has developed the following options for Council consideration. No final <br />decision is necessary immediately unless the Council is comfortable doing so. <br />However, we want to lay out the problems and some options so that Council is <br />briefed, has an opportunity to ask questions and to suggest other options for <br />consideration. <br />A Retube the Existin�; Chiller Vessel at an Estimated Cost of $175,000. <br />Rather than engage in an expensive and losing game of plugging more and <br />more leaky tubes maybe it is time to replace all 800+ tubes within the chiller <br />vessel. As you might imagine, these tubes are specially manufactured. It can <br />be quite tricky getting old, corroded tubes out of the existing vessel. But there <br />is a window in the side of building which houses the chiller vessel; this window <br />was designed for eventual re-tubing of the chiller vessel. Thus, it was antici- <br />pated that the chiller would have to be re-tubed, just not this soon. <br />