Laserfiche WebLink
�,� From 1999 through 2004 the national economy slowed the speculative market for hi-tech space � <br />and for offices. Job creation, especially hi tech and bio-tech office and research, also slowed. <br />The 2001 Master Plan which featured office and medical\technical uses was not flexible to the <br />market and the need for a medical campus, including a hospital, evaporated. <br />5. � In 2002-2003 Roseville Properties, one of the specialized developmentteam members, owned <br />buildings in the southwest comer of Twin Lakes (3 acres). Another portion of the area (14 <br />acres) was purchased by Roseville Properties in 2002. Rottlund Homes subsequently optioned <br />the PIK Terminal site (28 acres). The majority of the parcels are located within Tax Increment <br />District #11 and a Hazardous Substance Subdistrict. In December of 2003 the Twin Lakes <br />Stakeholder process was announced for February through July 2004 with the purpose to assist <br />Rottlund in refinement of new concepts for Twin Lakes. The Phase 1 land use plan was created <br />as a result of that process. <br />�.� After completion of the six month (January-July 2004) Twin Lakes Stakeholder Planning <br />Process Rottlund and specialized developers (Ryan Companies, Roseville Properties, and <br />Welsh Companies) refined their site plans for submission to the City. In September 2004, the <br />City Planner received the submittal package for distribution to the members of the <br />Development Review Committee (DRC) for review and comment. Concurrently, Rottlund <br />submitted complete plans for the Planning Commission's October public hearing. Even after <br />completion of the stakeholderprocess, Rottlund has continued to use the Stakeholder group as <br />an informal focus group regarding the proposed development, uses, its size, and improvements. <br />�_� A more detailed history of actions relating to the Twin Lakes Redevelopment area is attached, � <br />as well as comparison of the three Planning Districts (#2,9,10) impacted by this proposal. <br />�_$ Within Phase 1 of Twin Lakes Redevelopmentarea there is no existing housing. The proposed <br />project will provide the basis for future redevelopmentand a system of connections between <br />existing and new housing, essential services and employment through transit linkages and <br />public pathways. This proposal is consistent with the surrounding uses and the housing <br />objectives of the approved 2001 Master Site Plan to provide a mix of different housing choices. <br />�_� � YE A�J E S <br />#�. I The developer seeks to amend the 2001 master site plan but to retain the Roseville <br />Comprehensive Plan official designation of Twin Lakes as a Mixed Use Business Park. In <br />August of 2004, the staff requested an opinion from the City Attorney regarding whether a <br />master site plan change was, in fact, a change to the Comprehensive Plan or simply a change <br />to the supplemental plan (the master site plan). The Attorney's opinion (attached) indicated that <br />a supplemental plan or master site plan was an implementation tool, not the official goals, <br />polices, or designation of the site. <br />�.� In 2001 an Alternate Urban Area Review (similar to an EnvironmentalImpact Statement) <br />was prepared for the Comprehensive Plan change from Industrial Uses to Twin Lakes Mixed <br />Use Business Park Comprehensive Plan and submitted to the Minnesota Environmental Quality � <br />PF3595 - RCA Concept Plan and PrelimPlat Approval - 102504 Page 6 <br />