2004_1025_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� � E Craig Christenson, 2585 Wheeler, a member of the Stakeholder panel, supported the non- 2 residential design near the busy streets. He liked the industrial plan and use in Phase 2. �ti Traffic is a problem. The density ofthe proposed housing was too high. He objected to � the use of TIF. 6 1 � 6� fl �? �3 E� I� IG 17 �B a� �� Tim Callahan, 3062 Shorewood Lane, expressed concern with the shoreland management district ifthe PUD is treated as one lot. The coverage ofthe site is requiredto be 30%. He explained that the shoreland overlay is 1,000 feet from OHWL. The open space must be 50%or more. The ordinance applies to the developer's land. The 30 foot height is limited to a residential PUD. A four story building is more than 30 feet. Why is the ordinance thought of as an impediment? Why is the B-6 zone the undertying zone? Why is this possible? Is the big box in B-6 allowed? A big box is a non conforming use; why/how can it be rebuilt? Larry Sullivan, 3092 Fairview, a Stakeholder panel member, expressed concern about regional development. The regional impacts are not taken into account. There are changes to come all along 35W. He is concerned about traff'ic on Fairview, Lydia, and County Road D. What has the Planning Commission done with the Metropolitan Council? � L Tim Kotecki, 3078 Mount Ridge Road, 3078 Mt. Ridge Road, a Stakeholder panelist, ?� expressed concern about too much retail and traffic. He said there are 204 stores in the �? area. He provided a list of the stores. More retail will impact existing retail. There are 68 ��l restaurants within two miles; too many. The traff'ic on Fairview will increase; the road is �� at capacity now. Traffic (comparing the AUAR to the proposal) has 2% less traff'ic based �� on the cars on the road. �F �� �y 3� 3l �� �� �� 35 36 3? 3B �9 �� �L �� �� �4 �5 �#6 ----- ten minute break ----- 9:30 p.m. Terry Moses, 1776 Maple Lane, explained the rezoning for the Indianhead property (1987). He said the comprehensiveplan is not being adhered to. He objected to the proposal. He explained how the property has not been developed, based on the Ryan Development Agreement through 2003. The parkway is not needed. The stand still traff'ic on 35W will enter the neighborhood through the parkway. It will force the County to widen Fairview and County road D to be four lanes. The tax base will not grow for 25 years. Development along the edges of the park should be opposed. Buffer the park from the residences. He prefers office buildings with only weekday traff'ic. How will deep excavations impact ground water and the lake? There will be 2000 new residents and no new park. The visual and new resident impact on the park will overburden the park. There will be more noise in the park. The back yards of the new homes will be the park, affecting wildlife. There needs to be balance between residence and retail. Quality of life is very important and should be protected. Dan Roe, 2100 Avon Street, a Stakeholder panelist, suggested review of www.rcl.or� for details. He asked if "improvement or do nothing" is an issue? The 2001 office plan Page 7 of 12