My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_1025_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_1025_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 4:22:20 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:45:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session —10/18/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 8 <br />related to permit fees. <br />City Manager Beets noted that the projected $200,000 was net of <br />what they would pay in lieu of permit revenues. <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in support of the utility franchise fee in <br />order to find additional revenue sources. <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke against the utility franchise fee, in <br />consideration of the fee being passed through to customers. <br />Staff Directive <br />Council consensus was "no." <br />3. Are there other long-term, non-tax revenue sources the <br />Council wants to create? <br />Discussion <br />Councilmember Maschka questioned City Manager Beets <br />regarding revisions to the current City fee structure. <br />City Manager Beets noted that staff was preparing to come <br />before Council with proposed revised fees commensurate with <br />costs; and highlighted proposed inflationary increases for fire <br />inspections, liquor licenses, and building permit fees. <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned the status of proposed rental <br />license fees. <br />City Manager Beets noted that, experience from other <br />communities, indicated that the program only funded itself at <br />best; and usually required subsidizing due to creation of <br />incentives for good performance (i.e., waiving fees). <br />Councilmember Ihlan observed that, if fees are geared to <br />services provided, they're not a good long-term revenue source <br />to fill operating gaps. <br />Staff Directive <br />There was no Council consensus or specific direction to staff <br />related to additional non-tax revenue sources for the long-term. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.