Laserfiche WebLink
��� �irtq�����PPr�►��i: <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Manager Reviewed: <br />Item Description: Approval of Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreements <br />DATE: 11 /08/04 <br />ITEM: 3 , f <br />Agenda Section: <br />Conscnt <br />Background: Several years ago the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) turned <br />back to Ramsey County the segment of Rice Street (TH 49) from I-694 to UniversityAvenue. <br />As a result of that turn back, the County acquired the operation and maintenance responsibilities <br />for the traffic control signals along that section of Rice Street. <br />The turn back and subsequent jurisdictional changes require that new traffic signal maintenance <br />agreements be executed for several intersections. The City of Roseville is a party to new <br />agreements at the following locations along Rice Street: <br />A�reement # Intersection Parties <br />PW 2003-21 at County Road C Ramsey County, Little Canada, Roseville <br />PW 2003-22 at County Road B2 Ramsey County, Little Canada, Roseville <br />PW 2003-23 at Minnesota Street Ramsey County, Little Canada, Roseville <br />PW 2003-24 <br />PW 2003-26 <br />PW 2003-27 <br />at County Road B Ramsey County, Little Canada, Roseville, Maplewood <br />at Roselawn Avenue Ramsey County, Roseville, Maplewood <br />at Larpenteur Avenue Ramsey County, Roseville, Maplewood <br />All signals in place before the turn back to Ramsey County had maintenance agreements with <br />MnJDOT. These new agreements with the County simply replace them. Little Canada and <br />Maplewood are a party to these agreements in respective locations adjacent to their cities. <br />Discussion: The responsibilitiesof the City vary depending on the location and jurisdiction of <br />the intersecting roadways. For the most part, these provisions are currently in place and were <br />similar in the previous agreements with Mn/DOT. The City is responsible for power costs on the <br />intersections where we have municipal streets intersecting Rice Street. In return, on these <br />intersections the County does not bill the City for ongoing maintenance and other operational <br />costs. On the remaining intersections all signal costs are Ramsey County's. The City is <br />responsible for EVP costs. Little Canada has approved these agreements and Maplewood is in the <br />process of approving them. <br />Financial Implications: The City budgets annually for maintenance of traffic control signals for <br />which it is responsible. These agreements are consistent with the budgeted amounts. <br />Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approval of these signal maintenance <br />agreements. <br />