Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />� <br />� <br />���� � <br />5. Public Hearing: <br />a. Plannin� File 3604: Request by Jeff Brown for consideration of a <br />Preliminary Plat for property located at 2550 Hamline Avenue to create <br />four single family residential lots. <br />� <br />� Chair Mulder opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke to present <br />B the verbal summary of the staff report dated November 3,2004. <br />� <br />6{l Thomas Paschke advised that Jeff Brown (Hunters Development) seeks approval of a <br />! I Preliminary Plat to subdivide the 1.44 acre parcel at 2550 Hamline Avenue into four legal <br />��? conforming single family residential lots. Three of the proposed lots would have required <br />;� access on to Oakcrest Avenue and one must have access on to Hamline Avenue. <br />3� <br />� 5 He explained that each of the proposed lots meets or exceeds the requirements of the City <br />]�i Code regarding length, width, size and required set back. <br />8? <br />]8 <br />1� <br />�[� <br />�� <br />�2 <br />�� <br />�.a <br />�� <br />i� <br />J� <br />�� <br />� <br />�S <br />�� <br />�� <br />�1 <br />�� <br />�3 <br />�� <br />�� <br />3�a <br />�� <br />T�41�TH ��?N(�TH SI�E ��`�liA�.l� <br />�it}� ��d� �� f�� 110 feet 11,000 sq. ft. 30 feet <br />100 feet (corner) 100 feet (corner) 12,500 <br />corner <br />Lot 1 105 feet 114 feet 12,050 s. ft. 30 feet <br />Lot 2 115 feet comer 114 feet corner 13,194 s. ft. 30 feet <br />Lot 3 85 feet 220 feet 18,700 s. ft, 30 feet <br />Lot 4 85 feet 220 feet 18,700 s. ft. 30 feet <br />Mr. Paschke advised that City Staff had reviewed the submitted plans (utility, grading, <br />and drainage) and supports the size and location of all utilities proposed, and the <br />preliminary gradingldrainage plan and recommended approval subject to conditions <br />indicated in the project report dated November 3,2004. <br />Member Traynor asked what is the standard for lot subdivision. Thomas Paschke <br />explained the staff review uses the City Code, Subdivision and Zoning requirements. All <br />dimension criteria meet or exceed the City requirements in this proposal. No variances <br />are requested. <br />Member Bakeman asked for clarification of the easements and how they impact the <br />setbacks. Thomas Paschke explained the Xcel overhead and Amoco underground- <br />pipeline easements. No building setback is required from the easement. No driveway, <br />patio or man-made structure can be placed on the pipeline easement. <br />Member Pust asked who would bear the cost of utilities and road services (Developer's <br />costs). <br />