Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville Planning Commission <br />March 1; ?000 <br />Page 3 <br />"Unique circumstances" means that if the situation is common to all properties, a <br />variance should not be issued. There must be something different about the subject property, <br />such as the lot dimensions or orientation of the buildings or structures, or some other natural or <br />artificial characteristic such as street accesses, which would justify the deviation from the <br />standard. The unique circumstances can not be caused by the property owner, but the fact that <br />the owner acquired the property with knowledge of the limitation will not preclude issuance of a <br />variance. <br />The "essential character" test means the issuance of the variance can not cause a radical <br />change in the locality. Since zoning has as one of its principal goals the maintenance of property <br />values and the uninterrupted enjoyment and use of a person's property, the variance should not <br />prevent the property from "fitting in" with its neighboring properties. The city may impose <br />conditions in the granting of variances to insure compliance and to protect adjacent properties. <br />The decision whether to approve or deny a variance rests primarily with the appointed <br />and elected officials of a community, after evaluating the ordinance standards and the proposed <br />use in light of its potential impact on adjacent properties. The courts have repeatedly stated that <br />a municipal decision-making body has broad discretionary power to approve or deny an <br />application for variances; the fact that a court reviewing the action of a municipal body may <br />have arrived at a different conclusion, had it been a member of body, does not invalidate <br />judgment of city officials if they acted in good faith and within broad discretion accorded them <br />by state law and relevant ordinances. VanLandschoot v. Citv of Mendota Hei� 336 N.W.2d <br />503(1983). <br />Reviewing courts will not invalidate a city's zoning variance decision if the court can <br />determine that the city acted in good faith and within the broad discretion accorded it by statutes <br />and ordinances. Because the city's decision will only be reversed if its stated reasons are legally <br />insufficient or without factual basis, it is vitally important that the planning commission and <br />council members clearly state and specify their findings and rationale for whatever decision they <br />reach upon studying the information provided and the hearing. <br />Very truly yours, <br />Campbell Knutson <br />Professional Association <br />,� �� , <br />. _�__ � <br />_ � r�� � <br />777 <br />57308 <br />