Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br />�lanning File 998 - Medtronic, lnc. request for special use permit at 2199 Pascal Avenue <br />'resentation <br />�ally Lemker , representing Medtronic, indicated that they propose to lease the former <br />7eluxe Check building for three years. The facility would be used for the development <br />.�nd manufacture of electronic devices for treatment of acute and chronic pain patients, <br />stroke victims, etc. She indicated that there would be no construction of additions to <br />the building, It is estimated there will be 100 employees by the end of 1977. <br />Jiscussian <br />�ir. G. Johnson indicated he had visited the Medtronic Plant in St. Anthony and felt the <br />�roposed use of the building would be a fine addition for Roseville. <br />Recomnendat ion <br />�-ir. Kellett moved and Mr. Simons seconded, that the Commission recommend app�roval of <br />��Iedtronic, Inc. request for special use permit at 2199 Pascal Avenue. Roll (�all, Ayes: <br />`-iastel , Simons , Kellett, Rukavina and G. Johnson. Nays : None. <br />Plannin� File 999 - Har Mar, Inc. request for rezoning from R-1 to B-1-B, special use ;./ <br />permit and variances at 2100 North Snelling Avenue <br />Presentation <br />titrs. Marie Slawik indicated that she and Dr. Thomas Votel were proposing a joint venture <br />to develo� a medical building on the south portion of her existing parking lot. She stated <br />that Dr. otel would move his practice from the Lexington-Larpenteur Avenue Clinic in <br />St. Paul to this proposed facility in Roseville. Dr. Votel indicated that he has been <br />practicing in the area for 20 years and would like to return his practice to Roseville. <br />Mr. Jackels, architect representing the applicant, indicated that they did not propose to <br />change the traffic pattern at all; that the only entrance and exit would be from the Har-Mar <br />parking lot to the north. There would be no access to the proposed building from the south, <br />east or west residential areas. He stated that the landscaping would remain basically the <br />same except that it is proposed to reduce the 70 foot buffer strip on the west property line <br />�0 40 feet. <br />Dis cuss ion <br />i�ir. Art Soike asked why the 70 foot buffer zone could not be left intact and use more of the <br />parking lot already constructed to the south. <br />'•'�s. Slawik indicated the leases with the tenants of her shopping center require a certain <br />number of parking spaces to be provided. <br />-`Ir. John Owens, 1345 Skillman, asked why the owner of the shopping center did not poll the <br />tenants of the center and find out if they would be willing to reduce the number of- spaces <br />required in the lease. <br />`��-s. Slawik indicated that she could not break faith with the tenants. The leases are for <br />2� years. <br />`�Ir. Owens asked why the property owners should bear the burden of providing sufficient ark- <br />in� by reducing the buffer f-rom 70 feet to 40 feet. He stated that he welcomes the me�icai <br />building and thinks it will be fine addition, but that the buffer strip should remain at <br />70 feet. <br />