Laserfiche WebLink
10 spaces); 2) placing parking along the east face of the building, adj acent �o Victoria (adds <br />25 to 30 spaces but puts parking adjacent to resident rooms and requires a State waiver); 3) <br />constructing a parking ramp — considered too expensive; 4) sharing parking with adj oining <br />institutional uses. (MediaOne site no longer as excess space; nor does Rosewood complex.) <br />2.4 A building permit application for the parking lot expansion and other site improvements was <br />submitted on May 9, 2000. The applicant provided information including a landscaping <br />plan, a lighting plan, storm water runoff calculations, and an explanation of how the slope <br />would be ��egetated. Surface water w`I be retailed on site, on the surface of the new parking <br />lot which will be slightly lower (1 foot) than the existing lot. <br />In the past, residents were concerned about the removal of trees on the Lake Ridge property, <br />which provides a visual and sound barrier between their properties and the nursing home. <br />They also expressed concerns with the proposed slope between the property line and the <br />parking area (2H: 1V). Such a steep slope is only advisable if it has a soil erosion plan and is <br />planted with naturalized plant material which does not need mowing. <br />2.5 The proposed grading plan and landscaping plan were reviewed by the City Engineering staff <br />and have previously been reviewed by the Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation <br />District. Crass Lake Water Management Organization must also review and approve of the <br />plans. A Landscape Architect has been hired by Lake Ridge to complete a naturalized <br />landscape and to review the methods (including retaining wa11s) for protection of large trees <br />that may be saved. <br />2. 6 Section 705.O1B(6) of the City Code states that a permit for excavation and grading is <br />required from the City Council for any filling or excavating on developed <br />commercial/industrial property where the site is greater than 2.5 acres and the proposed <br />fill/excavation exceeds 5,000 cubic yards. The Lake Ridge parcel is 5.6 acres in size and the <br />proposed excavation is estimated at over 13,000 cubic yards. Section 705.03 states, "all <br />permits required to be issued by the City Council will be issued only after the appropriate <br />notices have been sent to the adj acent property owners whose land might be affected by the <br />excavating, grading, surfacing or filling, and a hearing held. The City Manager or designee <br />will determine who the affected adj acent landowners are." <br />2.7 Section 1005.011 of the City Code states, "Where a business district abuts a residence <br />district, any new development sha11 include a buffer zone. There sha11 be a protective strip of <br />not less than ten feet (10') in width. Thi� protective strip sha11 contain no structures, sha11 not <br />be used for parking, off-street loading or storage and shall be landscaped. The landscape <br />treatment sha11 include a compact screen wa11 or fence but sha11 not extend within fifteen feet <br />(15') of the street right of way. The planting or fence design must be approved by the City <br />Council as being in harmony with a°sident .al neighborhood and providing sui�cient <br />screening of the commercial area. The hedge or fence shall be no less than six (6) nor more <br />than six and one-half feet (6'/i ) in height. " In Lake Ridge's case, the terrain slopes down <br />and away from the neighbors, reducing the impact of a 6 foot fence. The neighbors au3 the <br />applicant have agreed that an 8 foot fence in most cases will have more of a positive affect as <br />a screen for the parking lot. The staff concurs. <br />Lake Ridge PF3221 — RCA(052200) - Page 2 of 3 <br />