My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000_0522_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2000
>
2000_0522_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 9:50:07 AM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:49:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
254
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: <br />The applicant proposes a 67-foot tall monopole in the rear (west side) yard <br />area of the Countryside Restaurant. An associated four-foot by ten foot area is <br />required for equipment storage (cabinets) and is also a part of the conditional <br />use permit application. The equipment supports the monopole and would not <br />exceed five feet in height. Section 1�12.10A4 of the Roseville Zoning <br />Ordinance regulates private commercial antennas and towers. <br />Section 1013.O1.D of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance lists the criteria <br />reviewed when considering the issuance of a conditional use permit. The <br />criteria are as follows: impact of parking; impact on parks, streets, and other <br />public facilities; compatibility of site plan, internal traffic circulation, <br />landscaping, and structures with contiguous properties; impact of the use on <br />the market value of contiguous properties; impact on the general public health, <br />safety, and welfare; compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br />The Roseville City Council concludes the proposal meets the criteria specified <br />in Section 1013 .O 1D of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance. Specifically, the <br />proposed monopole and associated equipment structure will not create <br />additional traffic nor the need for additional public facilities. With proper <br />screening and landscaping, the equipment facility will not have an impact on <br />surrounding property or values. There appears to be no impact on general <br />health, safety, and public welfare. In addition, the proj ect complies with the <br />Comprehensive Plan designation as a business use. <br />4. The applicant has provided information indicating the technical dead <br />reception space surrounding the C-2 at Snelling location and a brief <br />description of the proposed coverage area of .75 mile radius. <br />5. The proposed monopole is comprised of galvanized steel and has the antenna <br />located in a cylinder on the top of the pole. <br />6. The monopole will be located in the same location as the current rear parking <br />lot light pole. This location is near a sizeable stand of mature deciduous trees <br />approximately 40 to 50 feet in height. <br />There are no City poles or private multi-tenant poles in this area of the <br />community. <br />8. The proposed location of the �onopo ,e and supporting equipment cabinets <br />meet the required setback of 30 feet from properry line. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.