2000_0522_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

2.2 Attachment 1 indicates three proposed "Plan" locations where a garage could be constructed. Plan 1 would require the removal of a very large maple tree and a side yard Setback Permit. Plan 2 would allow the structure construction, but would not eliminate the steep slope. Plan 2 also requires a turn-around that eliminates two large coniferous trees. Plan 3 requires the removal of a small deciduous tree and a variance. 2.3 In review of the three plans, staff has determined Plan 3 provides the most practical approach to solving access issues, whil ° affordi.io the least amount of loss to the existing vegetation on the parcel. Plan 2, with removal of �i►e existing mature tree, may be the most workable solution if the owner/applicant agrees to the loss of the tree. 2.4 Mr. Wieden seeks the variance to allow him to rectify a serious access issue along Dale Street during the wintertime and allowing him to keep his mature trees. 2.5 Mr. Wieden will make the appropriate modifications to the existing driveway on the south side of the lot to accommodate the new garage. Mr. Wieden will renovate the existing garage adj acent Dale Street and will be required to remove the existing access and driveway. 2.6 Applicable Code Requirements: 3.0 STAFF COMMENT 3.1 Variances may be granted where the strict enforcement of the literal provisions of the ordinance would cause "undue hardship". The granting of a variance shall only occur when it can be demonstrated that such an action will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls, the nli�ht of the land owner is due to circumstances uniaue to the pronertv not created bv the land owner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Conditions may be attached to a variance that mitigate the impacts on adj oining properties. 3.2 The Comprehensive Plan encourages recc ��struction and upgrading of residential structures (and neighborhood) throughout the community. Specifically, Section II (Community Wide — General) and Section III (Residential) list Roseville's goals and policies. (see attachment) 3.3 The City does not allow driveway access (slope) greater than 10%. Mr. Wieden's current driveway slope is between 16% and 19%. Plan 2 would not eliminate or reduce the grade of the slope. PF321 1— RCA (052200) Page 2 of 4