Laserfiche WebLink
b. The unique physical features or situations within the proposal that could justify a <br />variance include safety, topography ...(no reasonable place to construct garage <br />except south side of home) <br />The economic issues that may (in part) justify a variance include ...(may not <br />apply) <br />d. The alternative designs that allow use of the site but do not require a variance <br />include ...(Plan L• existing conditions with substandard driveway; Plan 2: <br />construct garage at southwest corner of lot removing existing mature tree) <br />e. The impacts of the project, if the variance was issued, would (would not) create <br />significant community impacts on the health, improved safety, or general welfare <br />including ...(Plan I does not reduce pedestrian-vehicle safety) <br />f. Other findings deemed appropriate by the City Council <br />6.2 By resolution, approve (deny) the a variance request for Mr. Ken Wieden, 2 125 Dale Street <br />North, to a11ow construction of an attached or detached two sta11 garage, subject to findings <br />determined by the City Council. <br />Attachments: Property location map; aerial photo; site plan; house plan; and narrative. <br />60-day Time Limit: Application accepted on Apri128, 2000; Decision deadline is June 26, 2000. <br />Prepared by: Thomas Paschke (490-2236) <br />Q:�Planning Files�3211_Wieden, Kenneth�RCA (061200).doc <br />PF3211 — RCA (061200) Page 4 of 4 <br />