Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />� <br />s <br />9 <br />lo <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />1� <br />ls <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />2� <br />2s <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />Extract of Draft Minutes from Planninn Commission Meeting of .Tulv 12.2000: <br />6e. Plannin� File 3233: Request by Dean Sabetti for a front yard setback <br />Variance to allow an addition to the existing garage on property located at <br />2016 Beacon Street. <br />Chair Klausing opened the hearing and requested Tomas Paschke to <br />provide a verbal summary of the proj ect report dated July 12, 2000. <br />Thomas Paschke explained the purpose of the report to provide wheel <br />chair access. The existing garage and addition require a variance to set <br />within ten feet of the comer side lot line (which is the same as front yard). <br />Staff recommended the Commission prepare findings and that the <br />Planning Commission approve the variance. <br />Thomas Paschke noted that two neighbors had requested additional <br />information or had comments. <br />Member Mulder asked for details of the existing setback, and noted that <br />the proposal will not increase the non-conformity of a ten-foot setback. <br />The structure would simply be widened. It is a modification to the pre- <br />existing non-conforming use. <br />Member Rhody asked if the variance remains only as long as the building <br />remains (yes). <br />Member Olson asked if the exterior brick would be a more expensive <br />alternative — but may be more difficult to match. <br />Chair Klausing asked if there are architectural drawings (no). <br />Dean Sabetti answered questions. The roof of the garage will have to be <br />removed and rebuilt as a whole new roo£ He proposed all brick on the <br />front, vinyl siding on the side and rear, which will be screened from street <br />view. <br />Member Olson said the existing house (all brick) looks fine. <br />Member Wilke asked if all remodeling would be south of the line of the <br />existing fence (yes). <br />Member Egli asked whether two or three cars (an access ramp for the van <br />with a 2-stall garage, but framed for three cars if needed). Member Egli <br />asked if the driveway would need a variance. <br />Chair Klausing asked if exterior truck parking would be retained (yes). <br />