My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000_0925_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2000
>
2000_0925_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:56:28 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:51:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3.0 STAFF COMMENT & FINDINGS <br />3.1 Susan Bruhn applied for and the City held a hearing on a Setback Permit on August 3, <br />2000 to replace the porch enclosure. However, after verifying property lines, it was <br />determined a variance was necessary. <br />3.2 Section 104.02D, Dwelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, Frontage, Yard <br />and Lot Area Requirements in R-1 Districts, requires all principal structures to be set <br />back a minimum of 30 feet from the rear property line. <br />3.3 Ms. Bruhn's was constructed in 195 1 having the principal structure set back 84 feet from <br />the front properry line (adj acent to Cleveland Avenue) and 27 feet from the rear properry <br />line. The screen porch addition was constructed to be 17 feet from the rear property line. <br />3.4 Ms. Bruhn's exiting home and screen porch is considered pre-existing non-conforming <br />uses that require variances in order to modify or replaced (Section 1011.02 Roseville City <br />Code). <br />3.5 Ms. Bruhn purchased the home with the screened porch, not knowing the porch location <br />did not conform to the Roseville City Code. (i.e., She did not cause the situation.) <br />4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />4.1 Staff has determined that unique hardships are present and warrant the granting of a <br />variance to Ms. Bruhn as outlined in Section 3 of the project report. Staff recommends <br />approval of the 13-foot variance for the replacement of a screened enclosure by the <br />Roseville City Council. <br />5.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />5.1 On September 13, 2000, the Roseville Planning Commission held the hearing regarding <br />the Susan Bruhn variance request. Except for the adjacent property owner, At the <br />hearing no citizens were present to address the Commission. Staff indicated that it <br />received a few calls on the request, all supporting the variance. <br />5.2 The adj acent property owner indicated to the Commission that the original parcel was <br />600 plus feet deep. When the property was divided a number of years ago, the approval <br />of the subdivision created the non-conforming porch. <br />5.3 The Commission voted (6 — 0) to recommend approval of the variance requested by <br />Susan Bruhn, 1983 Cleveland Avenue, for a 13-foot rear yard setback variance allowing <br />a replacement of a screened porch enclosure. <br />PF3252 — RCA (092500) Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.