My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000_0925_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2000
>
2000_0925_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 1:56:28 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:51:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WHEREAS, the site is zoned `B-3", General Business District, has a Comprehensive <br />Plan designation of "B", Business, and is located in Comprehensive Planning District No, 14; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the <br />request on Wednesday, September 13, 2000, and recommended approval (6-0) of the variances <br />being requested based on the following: <br />Findings: <br />Whereas, the Planning Commission found that a strict application of the City Code would <br />workan unusual hardship on the applicant; and <br />Whereas, speczfically, that the unique physical feature of the principal structure being <br />located so far west on the parcel that it prevents exit from the car wash without a variance; and <br />Whereas, the hardship was not created by the applicant; and <br />Whereas, granting of the variance will not significantly impact the health, safety or general <br />welfare of the community; and <br />Whereas, the variance is needed to allow suffi�cient safety turn radius for fuel tr ucks; and <br />Whereas, specifically, the unique physical feature of the limited size of the parcel of land <br />prevents the applicant fr'om providing adequate ingress and egress to his business without a <br />variance. <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation on Monday, September 25, 2000 and made the following findings: <br />The City has determined that the site has unique characteristics, few alternatives, and <br />preexisting hardships that warrant granting a variance. Further, the conditional use <br />permit meets the necessary criteria to allow the renovation and expansion project <br />because it is properly zoned for auto service in an area where autos are the primarily <br />transportation mode; it can visually enhance the corner and the pre-existing <br />site/stv�ucture; and itwill provide a more functional fuel/service carwash facility. <br />2. A strict application of the City Code would impose an unusual hardship on the <br />applicant. <br />3. The unique physical feature of the principal structure being located so far west on the <br />parcel that itprevents exit from the car wash without a variance. <br />The hardship was not created by the applicant. <br />5. Granting of the variance will not signifi�cantly impact the health, safety or general <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.