2000_0925_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Recommendation: Defer assessment until such time as this property redevelops or accesses Woodbridge Street. 3. Oral Objection: Josephine Alphonse, 2972 Woodbridge Street: PIN and Proposed Assessment: 01-29-23-14-0018 $1,259.00 Nlrs. Alphonse voiced a number of concerns regarding the reconstruction of Woodbridge Street and work done abutting her property. We have met with her and have the following to report: . Crack in driveway wing: This is a warranty item, the Contractor will replace it this fall. . Widening of an existing crack in the center of the driveway: This is a damage claim that has been referred to the Contractor. . Tree health: Two evergreen trees located in the boulevard were trimmed up. There is some sap weeping where the branches were cut of£ The City Forester has looked at the trees and stated that the trees appear to be in good health. . Sod questions: The area under the evergreen trees did not have grass prior to the construction wark The Contractor sodded under the trees after they were trimmed up. The sod appears to be doing as well as the rest of the lawn. Recommendation: No change in Assessment 4. Oral Objection: Quent Hecker- 3050 Woodbridge Street PIN and Proposed Assessment: 01-29-23-11-0026 $1,416.38 Mr. Heckert had a concern about his driveway appearance, the Contractor sealed the driveway at the request of the resident to address his aesthetic concerns. He also wanted the City to relocate his northwest property corner, the survey crew has done this at this time. Recommendation: No change in Assessment 5. Oral Objection: Michael McGinley- 2801 Woodbridge Street PIN and Proposed Assessment: 01-29-23-41-0013 $1,377.03 Mr. McGinley had questions about the new sanitary sewer service that was installed in conjunction with this project. He had a sewer backup and questioned if the line was clean. We televised the service and found some roots at the connection to the main. The City will wark with Mr. McGinley to resolve this obstruction. He also questioned an additional cost on his sanitary sewer service replacement charge. This additional cost was the interest accumulated for waiting a year to pay it off. Recommendation: No change in Assessment