Laserfiche WebLink
Extract ofMinutes from Planning Commission 11.08.00 MeetinQ: <br />s a. Planning File 3272: A request by Natalij a Ericksen, 2376 Cohansey Street, for <br />4 a 264 square foot variance from Section 1004.O1A6 (Accessory Buildings in <br />5 Residential Districts) of the Roseville City Code. <br />6 <br />� Chairman Craig Klausing opened the public hearing and requested Community <br />s Development Director Dennis Welsch to provide a verbal summary of the staff <br />9 report dated November 8, 2000. <br />10 <br />ii Dennis Welsch explained that the site is surrounded by R- 1 zoned properry. <br />i2 There was a deteriorated shed that was removed. The lot is large (27,791 <br />1s sq.ft.total) and unusually deep. The new shed would be for storing lawn <br />i4 equipment and for a playhouse. Welsch illustrated the site existing conditions and <br />i5 location of footings for proposed shed and the elevations of the shed. <br />16 <br />i� Welsch presented staffs recommendations and findings regarding the proposal <br />is and the staff recommendation to deny the variance because of the lack of a <br />i9 physical hardship for the increased size of the structure, and because alternatives <br />2o do e�st. <br />21 <br />22 Chair Klausing asked for details regarding the existing tool shed and detached <br />2s garage; how many bildings are allowed? (two). <br />24 <br />25 Member Mulder wanted details on the new foundation under construction — what <br />26 is the history? Member Mulder asked what was the maximum square footage <br />2� allowed and does the garage meet this standard? <br />2s <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />Member Olson asked what the maximum playhouse size could be and how the <br />city treated it (a detached structure). <br />Member Wilke asked what hardships the applicant identified. <br />Member Mulder asked if the applicant could fix up the old shed instead of tearing <br />lt dOWri. <br />s� The applicant, MS Ericksen, said she felt the application was not presented very <br />ss clearly. She felt the application and interpretation of the Code was confusing. Ms. <br />s9 Ericksen said the original shed was an eyesore and falling down. The yard is <br />40 large. There is lots of equipment now outside the garage. The garage would be <br />4i replaced in the next year. <br />42 <br />4s Chair Klausing stated the size of the structure is a concern to the Commission. He <br />44 asked if a large garage could be constructed and a smaller shed building. <br />45 <br />