Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, December 07, 2009 <br />Page 3 <br />cant tax increases, and when those property owners were on a fixed income, such as him, <br />this was a significant increase. Mr. Grefenberg advised that he didn't object to vehicle <br />replacements and recognized the problem coming from the State of MN and reductions in <br />local government aid, but noted that Roseville received no government aid; and didn't <br />understand their rationale for making up in one year past losses when wages remained <br />stagnant and unemployment was so high. Mr. Grefenberg opined that the proposed <br />budget was not fair, and was asking senior citizens, those with frozen wages, and those <br />unemployed to pay more when they were paid less. <br />Mr. Grefenberg referenced Mr. Lambert's comparison of levy increases versus resident <br />wage increases; and noted that, whether these statistics were valid or not, this was not a <br />good economy to propose higher taxes, when the only ones being asked to sacrifice are <br />property tax payers. Mr. Grefenberg spoke in support of City employee wages, as public <br />servants, to make further reductions in conference attendance, further reductions in over- <br />time, and additional wage concessions such as step increases and previously-negotiated <br />contract wages being frozen. Mr. Grefenberg opined that this represented just a few <br />items he considered "low hanging fruit" that was available to further reduce the City's <br />budget from a staff perspective. Mr. Grefenberg further opined that the reductions taken <br />mid-year in 2009 to the adopted budget didn't appear to cripple the City in providing <br />adequate services. <br />Jon Abeler, 2339 Roselawn <br />Mr. Abeler noted that his TNT statement showed his property taxes actually declining; <br />however, he recognized that this was not the case for all property owners; and expressed <br />concern that in this tough economy, there were still increases in the City's budget that <br />were being borne by taxpayers. Mr. Abeler opined that this was not good for the com- <br />munity in the long-run; and expressed concern that future increases would be forthcom- <br />ing. Mr. Abeler asked that the City Council accept their call to do what they could to <br />keep costs in line now and in the future. <br />John Kysylyczyn, 3083 N Victoria Street <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn advised for the record, that his property taxes were going down, but only <br />due to his appeal to Ramsey County to reduce its value. Mr. Kysylyczyn repeated past <br />comments that he didn't appreciate the lobbying and misleading information provided on <br />an annual basis by staff on the budgeting process (i.e., comparison with peer cities), not- <br />ing that those comparisons cities (Maplewood and Shoreview) had community centers; <br />and that another (St. Louis Park) applied half of their recycling profits to taxes. Mr. Ky- <br />sylyczyn further criticized the comparisons of City services to those of select utility bills; <br />addressed the fees applied for services and programs in lieu of taxes; expressed his con- <br />cern that there were more employees and Advisory Commissioners present at the com- <br />munitymeetings held on the BFO process than private citizens, indicating a complete and <br />total failure in marketing by staff; and referred to the line items budgets available during <br />his tenure as Mayor. Mr. Kysylyczyn questioned whether the City Council was doing <br />everything it could to reduce this huge tax increase, such as not paying for two leaf <br />dumps; alleged billing of taxpayers by staff for producing a video, even if the money <br />