CC_Minutes_2009_1207 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, December 07, 2009 Page 8 process and provide that information to Councilmember Ihlan as requested; how- ever they were unable to provide more detail on the tax-supported budget line items as the document had yet to be created. Mr. Malinen advised. that the base line 2009 budget document, with line item attachments and detail, was currently being used for development of the 2010 budget. Councilmember Johnson opined that, when the City Council majority had chosen to follow the BFO process this year, he had made a commitment as a Council- member to that process. Councilmember Johnson noted that, at that time, Coun- cilmember Ihlan had expressed her discomfort with that BFO process. Council- member Johnson, however, noted that Councilmember Ihlan's motion was re- questing the City to do two types of budgets at the same time; a labor intensive feat that would defeat the purpose of giving this budget process a fair chance. Councilmember Johnson reiterated his commitment to the process, and out of re- spect for that commitment, could not support Councilmember Ihlan's motion. Councilmember Roe noted that City Manager Malinen had made the point that the 2009 information was available, and advised that he was using this information as he proceeded through the BFO process for the 2010 budget. Councilmember Roe noted, that going in to the BFO process for the 2011 budget, the line item detail would then be included as part of this first year's process and reflecting the changes made by the City Council this year. Councilmember Roe opined that, in the decision-making process, it was not right to say that the information was not needed; however, he further opined that it was not right to say that the City Coun- cil and public did not have the information, since the detail was available with the 2009 budget. Councilmember Pust spoke in support of the motion, as well as previous requests for 2010 budget detail of Councilmember Ihlan, not based on her respect of the BFO process. Councilmember Pust noted that she'd heard that providing the in- formation was atime-consuming task for staff, while also hearing that it was not labor intensive. Councilmember Pust reviewed the information that Council- member Ihlan had received from staff when she filed the data practices informa- tion request, included for Council information tonight that included budget ex- penditure summaries for all the various funds and for 2010 budget numbers, with some lines "x'd" out and a total figure put in from the BFO process. Ms. Pust fur- ther noted that 2009 budget numbers were included, and if 2010 budget numbers were the same as 2009, staff could have transferred that information; and if it wasn't the same, based on the 10 items that had been adjusted mid-year in 2009, staff could have indicated those different figures for those 10 items. Council- member Pust opined that it wasn't the Council's job to decide what Councilmem- bers needed during the budget process, and that she needed to be treated fairly even if all Councilmembers were not in agreement on the information needed. Councilmember Pust noted that at previous meetings, she had heard Finance Di- rector Miller say that providing the information would be extremely labor-