My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_1221
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_1221
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2010 8:52:15 AM
Creation date
1/20/2010 8:52:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/21/2009
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, December 21, 2009 <br />Page 20 <br />Motion carried. <br />Amendment <br />Ihlan moved that Police Department overtime, other than for police emergencies and/or <br />major investigations, be reduced by half ($45,000) in overtime paid for training or non- <br />necessary functions. <br />Councilmember Pust opined that if staff worked overtime, the City was required by law <br />to pay them based on fair labor standards; and noted that all departments were aware of <br />their staffing needs and budgets and could use their discretion. <br />Mayor Klausing declared the motion failed due to lack of a second. <br />Mayor Klausing called the original motion, as amended, with the proposed levy reduced <br />by $17,596 for a new total of $14,282,404. <br />Roll Call (Original motion) as amended <br />Ayes: Johnson; Roe; and Klausing. <br />Nays: Ihlan and Pust. <br />Motion carried. <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke in opposition to the original motion, based on citizens facing <br />unemployment or stagnant or falling wages. <br />Public Comment <br />Gary Grefenberg <br />Mr. Grefenberg noted that there remained 4-5 national conferences for the City Manager; <br />and opined that he didn't see any sacrifices being made by public employees for the <br />benefit of City taxpayers. Mr. Grefenberg further requested an opportunity for public <br />discussion and ranking for the ten-year CIP, opining that a proposed 7% annual increase <br />was not sustainable to taxpayers. Mr. Grefenberg begged that the budget process for <br />2011 be a totally transparent one; with detail line items provided much earlier in the <br />process. <br />Councilmember Pust thanked Department Heads for their patience throughout the proc- <br />ess; for being present to listen to City Council discussions; and expressed her apprecia- <br />tion for their work and availability to continually answer questions. Councilmember Pust <br />thanked Councilmembers for having honest discussions from differing viewpoints, allow- <br />ing the public to hear their options and those differing views. <br />Klausing moved, Roe seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 10773 entitled, "Resolution <br />Adopting the Final 2010 Annual Budget for the City of Roseville;" in the amount of <br />$37,703,959. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.