Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, December 21, 2009 <br />Page 5 <br />1. Adopt a Resolution to Authorize Final Payment on the 2009 Sanitary Sewer <br />Lining Project <br />Pust moved, Johnson seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 10769 entitled, "Final <br />Contract Acceptance - 2009 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project;" accepting the work <br />completed, starting the one-year warranty, and authorizing final payment of <br />$197,571.20. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Johnson; Roe; Ihlan; Pust; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />n. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Master Subscriber Agreement for <br />Minnesota Court Data Services <br />Pust moved, Johnson seconded, authorizing the City Manager to sign the Master <br />Subscriber Agreement for Minnesota Court Services;" as detailed in Attachment <br />A of the Request for Council Action dated December 21, 2009. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Johnson; Roe; Ihlan; Pust; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />8. Consider Items Removed from Consent <br />m. Approve a Request by the City of Roseville in cooperation with Hagen Ven- <br />tures, LLC for approval of a Registered Land Survey (PF09-034) (Former <br />Consent Item 7.h) <br />At the request of Mayor Klausing, City Manager Bill Malinen briefly reviewed <br />this request as detailed in the Request for City Council Action dated December <br />21, 2009; related to the Registered Land Survey (RLS) for new property descrip- <br />tions resulting from the City's pending purchase of right-of--way necessary for <br />Twin Lakes Parkway. <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned the cost of the survey and who was paying those <br />costs. <br />Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon advised that the total cost <br />was estimated to be $4,900, which would be paid through Tax Increment Financ- <br />ing (TIF) District 17; and would be the City's cost for the subdivision, and would <br />not be shared with Hagen Ventures, LLC. <br />Councilmember Ihlan advised that she would vote against the motion; opining <br />that this was related to the $1 million acquisition of property expending public <br />monies with no immediate need for its purchase. Councilmember Ihlan further <br />opined that, while the property may be needed in the future, the money should be <br />spent at that time rather than paying money to a private developer and then leas- <br />