My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_0104
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_0104
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2010 9:08:34 AM
Creation date
1/20/2010 9:08:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/4/2010
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, January 04, 2010 <br />Page 5 <br />built as a police package specifically for high risk runs. This emergency type driv- <br />ing makes it difficult to increase miles per gallon when it's geared to high inten- <br />sity use. The police department does not compute its own miles per gallon esti- <br />mates. He noted that the mileage rate referenced by Councilmember Ihlan was <br />based on other industry standards. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that this discussion on replacement cycles and/or deferrals <br />was held during budget discussions. <br />Councilmember Ihlan advised that she may not support the motion, based on her <br />preference to review the City's entire fleet, and whether an unmarked vehicle <br />could be used for a longer cycle than a marked squad. <br />Councilmember Pust asked Acting Chief Mathwig to explain the definition of a <br />patrol vehicle and a traffic vehicle. <br />Acting Chief Mathwig advised that this traffic vehicle is essentially an unmarked <br />patrol vehicle with no exterior light bars, and from a distance, appeared to be a <br />plain vehicle, and that for the purposes of the Roseville Police Department, was <br />considered synonymous with a patrol vehicle, but was used exclusively for traffic. <br />Councilmember Johnson noted that the City Council, during budget discussions, <br />had talked about the Dallas, TX study and turnover goals for vehicles; however, <br />he noted that at that time, it was noted that elements in MN weather and normal <br />wear and tear due to that weather, may not be comparable to replacement of vehi- <br />cles in TX. <br />Councilmember Roe noted that the vehicle proposed for replacement was a 2005 <br />vehicle; and even if other jurisdictions replace their vehicles at 100,000 rather <br />than 75,000 miles, it would make sense to replace this vehicle since it was at <br />96,000; and confirmed with Acting Chief Mathwig that other unmarked vehicles <br />were used for non-patrol or investigative vehicles. <br />Acting Chief Mathwig noted that this vehicle was the highest mileage vehicle in <br />the fleet, and the first to be rotated out; and that while a vehicle with such high <br />mileage would be equipped with lights, by policy, it would not be used for ag- <br />gressive or patrol situations, except in emergency situations. <br />Councilmember Roe noted that, in past discussions, staff had revised their poli- <br />cies in terms of idling and other cost-saving measures; however, he noted that in <br />certain circumstances, a police vehicle had to be left to idle. <br />Roe moved, Johnson seconded, approval of general purchases and/or contracts as <br />follows: <br />De artment Vendor Item/Descri tion Amount <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.