Laserfiche WebLink
19 4.0 BACKGROUND <br />20 4.1 <br />21 <br />22 42 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 4.3 <br />2s <br />29 <br />30 5.0 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />The property at 2931 Partridge Road has a Comprehensive Plan designation of Industrial <br />(I) and a zoning classification of General Industrial District (I-2). <br />A Special Use Permit (SUP) — essentially a precursor to the coN�iTioNaL usE — was <br />approved for the property in 1971 to allow commercial automobile leasing. Another SUP <br />was approved in 1991 to allow the previous vehicle emissions testing use, in addition to a <br />variance allowing the now-existing parking area to encroach into the required front yard <br />to avoid the multitude of easements throughout the middle and rear of the property. <br />This request for coN�iTioNaL usE approval has been prompted by the desire to occupy <br />part of the currently-vacant building with a bus company and part of the building with a <br />commercial landscaping and snow removal company. <br />STAFF COMMENTS <br />5.1 The proposed coN�iTioNaL usE includes the outdoor storage of buses as well as trucks, <br />trailers, skid-steer loaders, plow blades, etc. used in the landscaping/snow removal <br />operations, bulk landscape-material supply bins, and heavy equipment (e.g., loaders for <br />moving landscape materials from the bins onto the trucks). Although Planning Division <br />staff is uncertain how the 14 buses shown in the site plan would maneuver on the site <br />when as many bus drivers along with additional property maintenance workers and office <br />employees have parked their personal vehicles on the property, staff does not believe that <br />a definite site plan is necessary for approval of the proposed coN�iTloNaL usE. <br />52 Section 1007.015 (Industrial District Uses) of the City Code allows outdoor storage of <br />materials and equipment as a coN�iTioNaL usE in an I-2 district, as long as the storage <br />area is screened by a"solid opaque wall or fence no less than 8 feet in height" as <br />specified in § 1007.03B (Storage). Screening is not shown on the proposed site plan <br />(included with this staff report as Attachment D), but the site photos (in Attachment C) <br />illustrate a similar fence on a nearby property to the north. Section 1013.02B (Fences in <br />Front Yards), however, prohibits fences taller than 4 feet in a front yard, so the existing <br />fence extending in front of the building would need to be shortened or removed to <br />comply with this requirement. Because the screening of outdoor storage and front-yard <br />fence height are the subjects of requirements in the City Code there is no need to add <br />specific conditions to an approval of the coN�iTioNaL usE request. <br />50 53 Planning Division staff believes that the bins of bulk landscaping/snow-removal <br />5� materials would be inappropriate in the front yard and recommends that they be kept <br />52 behind the building along with as many buses as can be accommodated, leaving the front <br />53 of the building for some employee parking and/or storage of motor vehicles similar to <br />54 what is indicated on the site plan. Planning staff further recommends that parking spaces <br />55 be identified in the paved area in front of the building to ensure safe circulation as <br />56 required by the zoning requirements for parking area. <br />57 5.4 Both of the previous land uses (i.e., the commercial vehicle leasing and emissions <br />58 testing) which were allowed by special approval by the Planning Commission and City <br />5s Council would be considered permitted uses under the current City Code requirements, <br />so so there is no reason to address those uses in conjunction with this request. The 1991 <br />s� variance was approved by motion (rather than by resolution), however, and does not <br />appear to have been recorded against the property; Planning Division staff recommends <br />PF10-003 RCA 012510.doc <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />