Laserfiche WebLink
105 7.0 PUBLIC HEARING <br />� os 7.1 The duly-noticed public for this request was held by the Planning Commission on <br />� 07 January 6, 2010. Prior to the public hearing, Planning Division staff received <br />� 08 communication from the owner of the Carlson-LaVine property just to the north of the <br />� os subject site; the property owner encouraged the City to require screening around the area <br />� �o to be used for outdoor storage, similar to what was required for the Carlson-LaVine <br />� � � property. The outdoor storage use on the Carlson-LaVine property dates to 2001 when <br />� � 2 this was still a permitted use — provided it was screened by an 8-foot opaque wall/fence; <br />� � 3 not unti12005 did outdoor storage become a conditional use, although it still requires 8- <br />114 foot screening. <br />� � 5 72 Only the applicant was present at the public hearing to address the Planning Commission, <br />� � s and the applicant advocated for allowing the bulk storage bins to be located in the front <br />� � 7 yard and for delaying the requirement to install screen fencing until more properties in <br />� � 8 the area were required to meet the same standards. After discussing the issues, the <br />� � 9 Planning Commission voted unanimously (i.e., 5-0) to recommend approval of the <br />�2o proposed coN�iTioNaL usE with the conditions identified below. At the time this report <br />� 2� was prepared, draft minutes of the public hearing were not yet available. <br />�22 73 Since the public hearing, the applicant has become amenable to relocating the bulk <br />�23 material bins behind the building and immediately installing the required screening. The <br />�24 applicant has also clarified that the so-called "road salt" to be stored on the property for <br />�25 snow removal operations would be of the same variety that is available at hardware stores <br />�2s for residential use. Additionally, the salt would be covered at all times and is not <br />�27 expected to be stored on the property in quantities larger than about 30 cubic yards. <br />128 8.0 RECOMMENDATION <br />�29 Based on the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the comments and <br />� 3o findings outlined in Sections 5- 7 of this report, the Planning Division recommends <br />� 3� approval of the proposed coN�iTioNaL usE pursuant to § 1007.015 and § 1013.01 of the <br />�s2 Roseville City Code subject to the following conditions: <br />� s3 a. Buses, bulk supply bins or piles, heavy equipment, trailers, and trucks larger than <br />� s4 a"one-ton" size shall be stored behind the building on the paved areas not less <br />� s5 than 5 feet from the side and rear property lines; and <br />� ss b. The applicant shall work with staff to arrange the parking in the paved area in <br />� 37 front of the building in a way that meets the zoning requirements for parking area <br />� s8 circulation and shall re-stripe this area to clearly indicate spaces for parking/ <br />� 39 storing vehicles up to a"one-ton" size. <br />140 9.0 SUGGESTED ACTION <br />141 Adopt a resolution approving the proposed coNn�'r�oNAL usE allowing outdoor <br />� 42 storage of equipment and materials at 2931 Partridge Road and addressing the <br />�43 previously-approved variance to the required parking area setback, based on the <br />�44 comments and findings of Sections 5- 7, and the conditions of Section 8 of this report. <br />Prepared by: Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd <br />Attachments: A: Area map D: Proposed site plan <br />B: Aerial photo E: Draft resolution <br />C: Site photos <br />PF10-003 RCA 012510.doc <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />