My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010_0210_Ethics_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Ethics Commission
>
Packets
>
2010_0210_Ethics_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2011 7:28:18 AM
Creation date
2/3/2010 3:14:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Ethics Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 <br /> <br />The interest of any member of the immediate fa mily shall be considered to be an interest <br />of a person required to file a stat ement by or pursuant to this Code. <br /> <br />This Code shall not be construed to require the filing of any information relating to any <br />person's connection with or interest in any professional society or any charitable, <br />religious, social, fraternal, educational, recrea tional, public service, civil, or political <br />organization, or any similar organization not conducted as a business enterprise and <br />which is not engaged in the ownership or conduct of a business enterprise. <br /> <br />However, if any of such organizations seek ing any action or benefit come before a <br />Roseville commission or the Co uncil, then membersh ip in the organization shall be a <br />potential conflict of interest and must be re ported as such to the City Manager by the <br />Public Official in an amended disclosure stat ement. The other stipulations of this Code <br />then apply. <br /> <br />The City Manager shall inform each person who is required to file of the time and place <br />for filing. The City Manager shall inform th e Council whenever a person who is required <br />to file a statemen t fails to do so. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by <br />Council Member Pust and upon vote being taken thereon, th e following voted in favor: <br />Klausing, Maschka, and Pust. <br /> <br />and the following voted against: Ihlan and Kough <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.