res_10785 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ROSEVILLE RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held in the City Hall at 2660 Civic Center Drive, Roseville, Minnesota, on Monday, the 8`t' day of February, 2010, at 6:00 p.m. The following members were present: Johnson; Ihlan; Roe; and Klausing and the following were absent: Pust Councilperson Ihlan introduced and moved the adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 10785 RECEIVE THE FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE RICE STREET/ TH 36 BRIDGE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT AND ORDER PUBLIC HEARING FOR IMPROVEMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, as follows: WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted December 21, 2009, a report has been prepared by the City Engineer with reference to the improvement of the Rice Street/ TH 36 Bridge Reconstruction Project and, WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The City Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $28,700,000. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 8~' day of March, 2010, in the council chambers of the city hall at 6:00 p.m. and the City Manager shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required bylaw. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilperson Roe and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Johnson; Ihlan; Roe; and Klausing and the following voted against the same: none