CC_Minutes_2010_0111 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, January 11, 2010 Page 15 accommodate the necessary power and utility support equipment on open land, while not severely impacting the park's current or future uses. Further discussion included the number of proposed users, with one confirmed (Clearwire) and the tower engineered for future expansion up to 150' if approved by the City Council; and access for service for the tower from an 8' wide pathway leading to the proposed site, with construction of the tower proposing a challenge. Public Comment Mark Connolly, 240 County Road C Mr. Connolly spoke in opposition to this request, as a 35-year resident in this lo- cation. Mr. Connolly advised that homeowners had never been asked about this proposal, and that neither the Planning Commission nor the Parks and Recreation Commission were supportive. Mr. Connolly opined that, as an engineer, he thought there were alternative locations, such as Lady Slipper Park, since it is less amenable in appearance with existing rail and power lines in addition to being a less-populated area. Mr. Connolly further opined that it didn't make sense to put a commercial enterprise in a park used by residents from the community and wider area as well. Additional discussion among Councilmembers and staff included the status and timeline of the Master Plan process for parks. Parks and Recreation Director Brokke advised that it was about midpoint, with anticipated completion by June or July of 2010. Mr. Brokke advised that the lead- ing factor for consideration in the planning effort was if the park were to be re- tasked, then the tower may preclude that retasking. Mr. Brokke noted that the original location adjacent to the hockey rink was the least obtrusive and would serve to accommodate lighting as well; however, he noted that the co-location considerations gave the concept an entirely different look and extended the ground space requirements, and extending the height caused some concerns. Mr. Heiser addressed the gap area and potential locations and the inability of Lady Slipper Park to accommodate a tower based on the lack of available dry land to construct a tower. Mr. Heiser advised that other potential locations in that area put the tower even closer to residential properties. Mr. Heiser also addressed the suggested Walgreen's commercial site noting that it had been considered; how- ever, anywhere on that parcel would severely impact adjacent residential proper- ties in attempting to maintain a setback from Rice Street and accommodate park- ing considerations for the businesses. Johnson questioned why, based on the recommendation of the Planning Commis- sion and Parks and Recreation Commission, as well as the status of the Master Plan process, this request could not be delayed until the planning process was completed and why there seemed to be such urgency with the request.