Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, January 11, 2010 <br />Page 17 <br />Councilmember Pust, in attempting to honor the work of the Parks and Recreation <br />Commission and the Master Plan process itself, expressed her preference to wait <br />for approval, rather than actually denying the request, since it may be determined <br />that there will be no retasking identified for Acorn Park and this tower may fit <br />fine. <br />Councilmember Roe noted that the 60-day review period had already been ex- <br />tended by the City. Mr. Trudgeon concurred, noting that any further extension <br />would be at the discretion of the applicant. <br />Mr. Vavoulis, given the options of denial or deferral, advised that he would prefer <br />to offer a waiver of the 60-day extension, provided he was able to reach consen- <br />sus with the management at Clearwire, and if not asked that a decision be made at <br />the January 25, 2010 City Council meeting. Mr. Vavoulis advised that this waiver <br />would be based on attempting to resolve outstanding issues with the parks Master <br />Plan process and potential retasking of Acorn Park; and offered his willingness to <br />continue working with staff on any other alternative locations in the park or in the <br />community. <br />Pust moved, Roe seconded, to table discussion on this topic, based on the appli- <br />cant's approval from his management team for extension and subsequent written <br />waiver of the existing review period deadline. <br />Mayor Klausing clarified that if the applicant did not receive authorization for ex- <br />tension that the City Council would need to take action on this item at their Janu- <br />ary 25, 2010 meeting to meet the extension deadline of February 6, 2010. <br />Councilmember Pust strongly suggested that the Parks and Recreation Commis- <br />sion put their review and recommendation for the Acorn Park Master Plan as a <br />priority in their planning process, to achieve the allotted timeframe. <br />Councilmember Ihlan advised that she could support neither tabling action or ap- <br />proving placement of the tower, opining that such a commercial entity did not be- <br />long in a park; or in a wooded area used by people to get away from other activi- <br />ties; and further opined that based on those policy reasons, it should be easy to <br />deny the request. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that the proposed motion was non-debatable. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Pust; Roe; Johnson. <br />Nays: Ihlan and Klausing. <br />Motion carried. <br />