My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_010709
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
pm_010709
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2010 10:38:08 AM
Creation date
3/1/2010 10:38:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/7/2009
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, January 07, 2009 <br />Page 3 <br />Additional discussion included defining hazardous and/or flammable materials on the site <br />and/or in the containers themselves; definition by the Fire Marshal to clarify hazardous <br />material for inclusion of various materials, and addressing concerns about spillage on the <br />site; and concerns if storage pods or containers are stacked, how the Fire Department <br />could access them to prevent the spread of fire and/or toxic fumes; and potential <br />development of a fire prevention plan by the applicant to be periodically submitted to the <br />City’s Fire Marshal, recognizing that materials could be constantly changing as storage <br />containers and trailers were moved in and out on the site. <br />Further discussion included renewability of IUP’s as per City Code and annual monitoring <br />and notice processes; potential research and guidance from other communities with <br />outdoor storage of trailers in massive quantities (i.e., Blaine); and confirmation of the <br />applicant scheduling a neighborhood meeting with adjacent property owners and the <br />neighborhood, with no one in attendance. <br />Applicants, Jim Walston, Attorney for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. <br />John Livingston, Cent Ventures II <br />Mr. Walston addressed staff’s proposed revised condition #8 related to the term of the <br />IUP, and requested that a longer term be applied, based on economic factors and <br />practical purposes due to construction of the Park and Ride facility, easements on the <br />property, and the desire of Mr. McCarty to preserve property rights. Mr. Walston noted <br />that diminished use of the property based on past condemnation proceedings, and <br />credited Mr. Livingston with suggesting the IUP approach going forward. <br />When asked by Chair Bakeman if the property owner was clear on the intent of the IUP <br />replacing past non-conforming uses, Mr. Walston assured the Commissioners and <br />concurred that this was the understanding of himself and Mr. McCarty. <br />Mr. Livingston advised that, related to materials proposed for storage, the application was <br />seeking to address a range of possibilities that had been discussed with staff for potential <br />uses of the site until redevelopment could be achieved on the site, after the economic <br />market improves. Mr. Livingston further advised that there was no specific material <br />storage proposed on the site, other than to have the area in general utilized for container <br />storage (land/sea containers). While unable to speak for the current owner, Old <br />Dominion, Mr. Livingston advised that those trailers currently stored on site were empty, <br />but noted that some had refrigeration units that may hold fuel and refrigerant, and be a <br />hazardous material. Mr. Livingston further advised that the purpose of the application was <br />to provide some ongoing revenue to the site while awaiting improvement in the financial <br />market, allowing for future planning and redevelopment of the site, allowing a benefit for <br />all interested parties in the Twin Lakes area, and potential developers. Mr. Livingston <br />opined that, development of Mount Ridge Road and Twin Lakes Parkway, and other <br />infrastructure construction was vital to draw developers once the market improved. <br />Further discussion with Mr. Livingston included access to emergency equipment related <br />to materials stored outside storage containers; problems with stacking of containers and <br />access by the Fire Department; whether the containers would be empty or what type of <br />materials could be contained in them. <br />Mr. Livingston, as the property owner, advised that everything done on the property was <br />in compliance with the law; and recognized the concerns expressed about hazards, <br />noting that he shared those concerns. Mr. Livingston noted that the first word of the <br />requested permit indicated “Interim” and questioned how in such a permit every possible <br />use could be defined. Mr. Livingston advised that the applicant’s intent was to allow <br />themselves the latitude to garner some kind of income on the site, until the City <br />completes infrastructure construction, and Metro Transit completes its Park and Ride <br />facility, allowing for redevelopment of the rest of the site. <br />Chair Bakeman noted that the Twin Lakes area had long been designated for clean up <br />and redevelopment, obviously motivating the Commission’s concern about how it looked, <br />noting other areas of the City that also had trailer storage; and also noted that it would be <br />prudent to ensure that the Park and Ride facility looked good in its new setting. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.