Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, February 04, 2009 <br />Page 11 <br />Mr. Paschke clarified the procedural purposes for zoning from low to high density land use <br />487 <br />designation to guide the land. Mr. Paschke advised that through the PUD process, the <br />488 <br />City had the ability to regulate use for some type of multiple-family residency. <br />489 <br />Chair Bakeman opined that there was not enough setback for this project, the proposed <br />490 <br />building was too tall; and the building was too massive and filled the entire site. <br />491 <br />Commissioner Boerigter opined that it would take considerably less space without the <br />492 <br />above-ground stormwater retention ponds and setbacks; opining that it wasn’t that close <br />493 <br />to other structures with the exception of the Enzler home. Commissioner Boerigter opined <br />494 <br />that the height was too large as well. <br />495 <br />Commissioner Gottfried expressed his lack of comfort with the scope, volume and scale of <br />496 <br />the proposed project. <br />497 <br />Further discussion included perception of retaining more green space; determining what <br />498 <br />was the most appropriate project or design for this parcel; whether half the number of <br />499 <br />units on that particular lot would be the recommendation of the Commission; restrictions <br />500 <br />applicable to recommended PUD approval; or whether to recommend Comprehensive <br />501 <br />Plan amendment, not zoning, as a guide for future development; and the need for the <br />502 <br />Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code to be consistent and needing resolution in the <br />503 <br />future. <br />504 <br />MOTION (10.1) <br />505 <br />Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member Boerigter to RECOMMEND TO THE <br />506 <br />CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL of the COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT <br />507 <br />of 2025 County Road B from Low Density Residential (LF) to High Density <br />508 <br />Residential (HR); <br />509 <br />Ayes: 2 (Bakeman; Boerigter) <br />510 <br />Nays: 5 (Doherty; Martinson; Wozniak; Best; and Gottfried) <br />511 <br />Motion failed. <br />512 <br />MOTION <br />513 <br />Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member Boerigter to RECOMMEND TO THE <br />514 <br />CITY COUNCIL DENIAL of the application for land use designation of 2025 County <br />515 <br />Road B from Low Density Residential (LR) to High Density Residential (HR). <br />516 <br />MOTION (Amendment) <br />517 <br />Member Doherty moved, seconded by Member Gottfried to RECOMMEND TO THE <br />518 <br />CITY COUNCIL DENIAL of the application for Comprehensive Land Use Amendment <br />519 <br />of 2025 County Road B from Low Density Residential (LF) to High Density <br />520 <br />Residential (HR). <br />521 <br />Ayes: 4 (Best; Gottfried; Doherty; and Martinson) <br />522 <br />Nays: 3 (Bakeman; Boerigter; and Wozniak) <br />523 <br />Motion to deny the request carried. <br />524 <br />MOTION (10.2) <br />525 <br />Member Doherty moved, seconded by Member Martinson, to RECOMMEND TO THE <br />526 <br />CITY COUNCIL DENIAL of REZONING of 2025 County Road B from Single-Family <br />527 <br />Residential to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with an underlying zoning of <br />528 <br />General Residence District (R-3). <br />529 <br />Ayes: 3 (Doherty; Martinson; and Best) <br />530 <br />Nays: 4 (Boerigter; Gottfried; Wozniak; and Bakeman) <br />531 <br />Motion failed. <br />532 <br />MOTION (10.3) <br />533 <br />Member Doherty moved, seconded by Member Best, to RECOMMEND TO THE CITY <br />534 <br />COUNCIL DENIAL of the GENERAL CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, as <br />535 <br /> <br />