Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, October 07, 2009 <br />Page 5 <br />Further discussion included identification of adjacent park land, with zoning as R-1, but <br />designated as park land. <br />Applicant Representative John Kohler, Architect with Semper Development, Ltd. <br />Mr. Kohler addressed questions of the Commission related to lack of a development at <br />this time; pending Purchase Agreement for the parcels from Wewers Road to County <br />Road C; process in place for redevelopment of the hardware store and Walgreen’s site; <br />support of the owner for this application; and inclusion of the neighbor comments in any <br />future development proposals. <br />Mr. Kohler advised that his firm was more than willing to consider concerns of the <br />neighborhood; however, noted that depending on who redeveloped the property, the may <br />end up selling the property and not doing the actual redevelopment. Mr. Kohler noted that <br />they had designated shared access on the south side of Walgreen’s to be used on this <br />parcel, accessing Rice Street, as the property line splits shared access. <br />Public Comment <br />Staff noted two (2) written comments, attached hereto and made a part thereof, <br />expressing concern with future access onto Wewers Road, among other issues and <br />concerns. Those comments were from: Karen Engholm & Family at 175 Wewers <br />Road; and Gary & Lisa Wolf at 203 Wewers Road. <br />Cheri Marchio, 167 Wewers Road <br />Ms. Marchio, as the home immediately adjacent, opined that her parcel would be the most <br />directly-impacted; and expressed her concern related to increased traffic and safety <br />concerns onto Wewers. Ms. Marchio addressed increased traffic to-date in vehicles <br />avoiding the light at Rice Street and County Road C; and changes being experienced by <br />the residential neighborhood with commercial zoning impacts, specifically related to <br />bicycles and pedestrian traffic safety. <br />Ms. Marchio further addressed potential loss of trees screening their residential property, <br />and whether the two sections of retain wall would be designed consistently. Ms. Marchio <br />also addressed potential impacts to wildlife in that area; and expressed frustration in not <br />knowing that this was a potential possibility when originally purchasing their property. <br />Chair Doherty, based on past experience, suggested that the City had extensive <br />requirements for screening and/or berming commercial properties from residential areas. <br />Mr. Paschke refocused discussion on the request currently before the Planning <br />Commission, that of rezoning, a basic ordinance change from R-1 to B-3. Mr. Paschke <br />reiterated his comments related to future redevelopments coming forward, at which time <br />any screening, improvements, and mitigation of potential impacts would be addressed, <br />consistent with City Code; with other concerns taken into review at that time. <br />Chair Doherty expressed his confidence that staff had been made fully aware of the <br />concerns of the neighbors. <br />Gary Wolf, 203 Wewers Road <br />Mr. Wolf noted that he had providing written comment; and reviewed those comments. <br />Additional comments of Mr. Wolf included potential plans of the developer related to <br />demolition of existing buildings and whether the area would be cleared and left vacant and <br />ramifications if no future redevelopment occurs immediately. <br />Mr. Paschke noted that any developer would need to comply with City Code; and <br />reviewed the request currently before the Commission related to rezoning one parcel to <br />make it consistent with adjacent parcels and the 2030 Comprehensive Plan guidance. <br />Mr. Wolf noted current traffic and safety concerns on Wewers Road; potential median <br />placement along Rice Street that may further impact traffic in the area; and the current <br />quiet residential nature of the street. <br />Mr. Paschke reiterated that there were numerous ways to review and address <br />neighborhood issues; but that they could not be addressed without a development plan in <br /> <br />