CC_Minutes_2010_0208 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, February 08, 2010 Page 17 Discussion included past compliance checks in 2009. Councilmember Roe noted, in similar past action, the Police Chief had set the date of suspension, and questioned if that action should be included in the motion. Pust amended, Ihlan seconded amendment to the motion that the Roseville Police Department issue an administrative presumptive penalty for five days, with that said suspension to be at the discretion of Acting Police Chief Rick Mathwig. Further discussion included options for documented server training; Fuddruckers not taking part in that sanctioned training process; clear designation on the mi- nor's driver's license that they were under age 21; and options for cash registers and calendars to assist managers and their servers in avoiding compliance issues. Councilmember Johnson expressed astonishment that anyone could not be aware of a minor's driver's license as clearly designated. Roll Call Ayes: Johnson; Pust; Ihlan; Roe; and Klausing. Nays: None. d. Request to Perform an Abatement for Unresolved Violations of City Code at 1423 Judith Avenue Removed from this agenda. e. Request to Perform an Abatement for Unresolved Violations of City Code at 1175 County Road B West Removed from this agenda. 13. Business Items - Presentations/Discussions a. Discussion of Noise Wall Along Highway 36 as a part of the Rice Street In- terchange Project City Manager Malinen noted the additional information provided by staff, and in- clusion of the previously-completed MnDOT Sound Report. Mr. Malinen distrib- uted, as bench handouts, voice mail and a-mail responses from three neighbors: one a-mail from a resident at 204 Minnesota Avenue in support of the noise wall; one phone call from Tricia and Jeff Pedro, 2252 Marion Street in support of the noise wall; and another phone call from Don Ischer at 299 Capitol View in oppo- sition to the noise wall. Public Works Director Duane Schwartz and City Engineer Debra Bloom were present to provide additional visual information in response to citizen concerns re- lated to the proposed wall height and other concerns expressed at the Open House