CC_Minutes_2010_0208 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, February O8, 2010 Page 23 supported making a decision the wall, and those that wou impact of the wall. tonight based on the preference of those closest to d be impacted most by noise reduction and visual Councilmember Roe opined that it was fairly clear and would make sense that if people don't want the wall, the City Council wouldn't support the wall. However, Councilmember Roe suggested that it also made sense that everyone understood the impact of the wall; and that if the renderings helped in that process and changed some points of view, it was not problematic to wait two weeks until the next scheduled Council meeting, to hear their conclusions, as well as allowing residents a chance to ask questions of staff, other agencies, or neighbors in order to make a more informed decision. Councilmember Roe opined that this was a major decision, and it was inherent to get it right, while respecting the varying views and allowing residents a chance to consider other options. Discussion ensued among Councilmembers and staff regarding timing with Mr. Schwartz advising, from his perspective on the Project Design Team, that a deci- sion was needed by the end of February at the latest, with the City responsible for costs in changing the plan, in order for the project to be bid in April. Mr. Schwartz noted that Calibre Ridge had requested a delay in bidding the project. Mr. Schwartz noted that Ramsey County Public Works Director Jim Tolaas was also in the audience to respond to any questions of the City Council. Robert Deleo, 280 Minnesota Avenue Mr. Deleo requested a breakdown of the total cost of the wall: how much was City, State and Federal money; and questioned what would happen to the money if the wall wasn't built. Mr. Deleo referenced the "cost reasonableness criteria" comment in the RCA dated February 8, 2009, and questioned if the money needed to be spent. Mr. Deleo opined that everyone was having budget problems, but everyone was ready to keep spending money. Mr. Deleo further opined that a rendering should be done to allow residents along that street to have an accurate idea of what the wall would look like from their homes. Mr. Schwartz clarified that County, State and Federal monies were involved; and Mr. Goess advised that the "cost benefit criteria" had been developed by him to determine the level of benefit to be achieved for each affected resident, and whether or not construction of the wall met or exceeded operation of the wall cri- teria. Ms. Bloom advised that, if the wall didn't get built, funds would go to an- other wall somewhere else. Councilmember Pust advised that, having not been at the June 2009 Council meeting when the decision to construct the wall had been made, she was making her decisions based on a different perspective. Councilmember Pust opined that, if 95% of the residents didn't want the wall, then there was no reason to spend any government agency's money to build it. Councilmember Pust expressed