My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_0208
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_0208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2010 12:42:34 PM
Creation date
3/1/2010 12:42:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/8/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, February 08, 2010 <br />Page 25 <br />respect to this particular matter; with a separate motion to reconsider the previous <br />action. <br />Councilmember Ihlan, as one who voted in favor at that previous meeting, noted <br />that she would have the standing to move to reconsider. <br />City Attorney Bartholdi advised that this would be another option. <br />Councilmember Pust withdrew her original motion. <br />Ihlan moved, Roe seconded, to suspend the rules to entertain a motion to recon- <br />sider action taken previously by the City Council with respect to approval of a <br />noise wall; specifically because of the past deadline allowed by the rules to do so <br />without suspension. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Johnson; Pust; Ihlan; Roe; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />Ihlan moved, Pust seconded, to reconsider the decision of June 2009 by the City <br />Council to approve location of a noise wall. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Johnson; Pust; Ihlan; Roe; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />Pust moved, Ihlan seconded, to renew the motion that the City Council take action <br />to authorize the City's engineering staff to work with Calibre Ridge representa- <br />tives and property owners to find the right ending place for a noise wall, if any, to <br />be constructed; and that the ending point be at some position to allow the majority <br />of the residents to not have a wall, but to have input from Calibre Ridge to have <br />construction of a wall; and that the majority of the City Council understands that <br />there will be no wall built in front of those residents in opposition. <br />Councilmember Pust clarified for residents that they understand that the City <br />Council is unable to define the location of the end of the wall at this time, not due <br />to their input but that of Calibre Ridge. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the intent of the proposed motion; future formal ac- <br />tion to memorialize Cailbre Ridge's portion via resolution; intent that only a por- <br />tion of the wall be built in front of Calibre Ridge; but ultimately rescinding the <br />original motion made in June of 2009, due to reconsideration. <br />Mayor Klausing suggested that he abstain at this time, since he would have pre- <br />ferred another two weeks to consider the issue in its entirety. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.