Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, February 08, 2010 <br />Page 30 <br />f. Discuss a Recycling Contract Extension <br />Recycling Coordinator Tim Pratt briefly summarized the proposed Recycling <br />Contract Extension with Eureka Recycling, for a two year term through 2010, <br />with favorable terms for the City and allowing for competitive collection rates. <br />Mr. Pratt sought City Council direction, opining that this was a good offer. <br />Discussion included increased rates, representing atwenty-three percent (23%) <br />increase during the current contract term, based on holding off on rate increases <br />for several years by using revenue share monies and reserves, and this proposed <br />rate serving to build up City reserves in addition to addressing current costs and <br />reduced market of recycled materials. <br />At the request of Councilmembers, Mr. Miller advised that the overall contract <br />represented an approximate fifteen percent (15%) increase over a four year pe- <br />riod. <br />Further discussion included initial incorrect billing for multi-family rates due to <br />the contractor misreading the specifications and miscommunication between staff <br />members, and costs for multi-family recycling significantly higher, but not passed <br />on to the citizen, but paid for form reserves; and funding of the program from in- <br />creased user fees, SCORE grants, and other funds. <br />Additional discussion included projections of revenue sharing and marketability <br />of materials and potential impact to rates, with proposed contract language on the <br />extension more sustainable over the long-term and eliminating "floors" for paper <br />and aluminum recycling markets and materials, changing them from Chicago to <br />Minneapolis-based indexes. <br />Councilmember Ihlan clarified the intent in staff's recommendation to extend the <br />contract versus going out for bids, was that actual service costs would not be re- <br />duced, and that this presented a better option for the City; and staff provided <br />comparative and current collection charges, and city processing rates for other <br />haulers (i.e., Waste Management and Allied); noting that Eureka initiated and was <br />the only bidder originally providing the revenue sharing option and creating this <br />market that was now becoming standard practice among other haulers. <br />Councilmember Pust addressed this proposed contract extension in lieu of the <br />City's recently adopted professional services contract policy. Councilmember <br />Pust outlined staff's rationale in their recommendation, along with the City Coun- <br />cil's rationale in changing the policy for bidding out contracts to provide the most <br />transparency and most favorable deal for its citizens. Councilmember Pust opined <br />that, if this was the best option for the City, going out for bids would only serve to <br />prove that to the public. <br />