My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-04-17_Agenda
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2007
>
2007-04-17_Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2011 8:10:16 AM
Creation date
3/17/2010 2:32:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/17/2007
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Roseville HRA <br />HIA Survey Summary <br /> <br />Distributed to the membership of the Minnesota Chapter of the American Planning Association <br />Survey Responses: 23 <br /> <br /> <br />Dear MN Planner/Housing Professional: <br /> <br />The City of Roseville & the Roseville HRA is in the process of eval uating the use of the <br />public financing tool provided by MN State Statute 428A.11 called a Housing <br />Improvement Area (HIA). The City Counc il has asked if other suburban communities <br />have used this tool effectivel y and/or have chosen not to use the program as a method to <br />encourage improvement of older townhome and condominium common area repairs. <br /> <br /> <br />1. Has your community approved a HIA? Yes (3 Responses) <br /> No (20 Responses) <br /> <br />Three of our survey respondents are from ci ties that have implemented an HIA. <br />Those cities are St. Louis Park, Eagan and Plymouth. <br /> <br />2. If yes, <br />a. Do you think it is an effec tive tool? Why or why not. <br />• Eagan’s first district is in the stage between development agreement <br />and construction, so it is too early to draw conclusions about the effect <br />on the long term effect of the improvements on the quality of the <br />neighborhood in which it was approved, but to the point that we have <br />come, it appears to be an effective tool, because it is the only available <br />source of funding we have identifi ed for the improvement of common <br />area property in associations that are not capitalized sufficiently to <br />undertake substantial repair and maintenance. Most private lenders <br />deny large association improvements because the associations do not <br />have separate collateral and the exteriors and common areas have no <br />value separate from the individual units . Another way to put it is that <br />it is the only viable tool we have identified that can be effective. <br />• One of the most effective components is the requirement for assoc to <br />have a reserve study conducted. For some of our associations, this is <br />the first time they did a systematic long term plan for the bldgs and <br />finances. Although only 2 associations to date have completed the <br />whole process, staff has had discussi ons with 8 associations, of which 4 <br />did their first capital and financial long range plans.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.