Laserfiche WebLink
Motion: Member Pust moved, seconded by Member Maschka, to support CCHT’s application to <br />the Metropolitan Council’s Tax Base Revitalization Account for environmental cleanup funds to be <br />used for the evaluation of lead and asbestos within the structures of the Har Mar Apartment <br />Complex. <br /> <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Abstain: 1 – Kelsey <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br /> <br />b. Consider Refunding and Program Modifications to the HRA Ownership Loan Program. <br /> <br />Ms. Bennett summarized the item for consideration, explaining that the HRA had previously discussed <br />the possibility of restructuring the HRA Ownership Loan Program. Ms. Bennett provided background <br />information associated with the cash flow of the lo an pool and median assessed value of the homes that <br />have received the loans. Ms. Bennett noted that the loan program has been used frequently by residents <br />with 124 loans issued since its April of 2000. Ms . Bennett added that there are no income or assessed <br />value limitations on the loan program as the HRA had not wanted to duplicate state or county loans that <br />do carry these types of restrictions. Ms. Bennett r ecommended creating a median income limitation for <br />this program, using the 120% of median income cr iterion which is currently used in other HRA loan <br />programs, and recommended against creating an assessed value limitation. <br /> <br />Ms. Bennett indicated that there are insufficient funds in the loan pool to issue new loans. There are 4 <br />loan applications on hold pending the decision of th e HRA to refund the program. Ms. Bennett provided <br />the household income amounts for the four applications ($54,457, $55,377, $62,000 and $76,000.). <br /> <br />Ms. Bennett noted that the HRA Family Ownership Program has an assessed value limitation and a <br />family size associated with it. Ms. Bennett added th at only four loans have been issued through this <br />program due to those limitations. Ms. Bennett noted th at a direct mail campaign directed to eligible <br />homes was completed in 2006 which ge nerated a lot of interest but resulted in few loans issued. Ms. <br />Bennett recommended that the HRA consider folding the two loan programs together, adding an assessed <br />value limitation and removing the family size lim itation to better capture households eligible for <br />assistance. <br /> <br />Member Pust expressed a concern that the HRA provi des assistance to residents making 120% of median <br />income without knowing that the state and county loan programs designed for those making 80% of <br />median income are fully utilized. Member Pust opined that there should be an assessed value limitation <br />on the Ownership Loan program to en sure that the HRA is offering assistance to those residents with the <br />greatest need. Member Kelsey wondered if the prin ciple and interest captured from the loan program <br />could be rolled over to the following year (yes). Member Kelsey expressed her concern over the <br />increasing number of foreclosures in the community wh ich may create a greater need for HRA assistance <br />in the future. Member Kelsey suggested going through the strategic planni ng process before making any <br />changes to existing programs. <br /> <br />Member Masche wondered if these improvements would have taken place had the homeowners not <br />received the HRA loan assistance. Member Pust agreed that this in formation should be captured when <br />the loans are issued. Member Pust opined that the strategic planning discussion should take place as a <br />way to prioritize HRA programs to match the current needs of the community. Chair Majerus suggested <br />tabling the item until the strategic planning process has been completed. Member Kelsey suggested the <br />possibility of a moratorium. Member Pust suggested tabling the item for further discussion at the next <br />meeting. <br /> <br />